Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35490349›Full record

ArticleArtificial organs2022

Integration of sustained low-efficiency dialysis into extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A feasibility study.

Frederic Arnold, Rika Wobser, Johannes Kalbhenn, Lukas Westermann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial organs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frederic ArnoldDepartment of Medicine IV, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Rika WobserDepartment of Medicine IV, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Johannes KalbhennAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7551-5082
Lukas WestermannDepartment of Medicine IV, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-3767
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Berta-Ottenstein-ProgrammeElse-Koerner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2016_Kolleg.03)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere COVID-19 can necessitate multiple organ support including veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) and renal replacement therapy. The therapy can be complicated by venous thromboembolism due to COVID-19-related hypercoagulability, thus restricting vascular access beyond the vvECMO cannula. Although continuous renal replacement therapy can be performed via a vvECMO circuit, studies addressing sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) integration into vvECMO circuits are scarce. Here we address the lack of evidence by evaluating feasibility of SLED integration into vvECMO circuits.

methodsRetrospective cohort study on nine critically ill COVID-19 patients, treated with integrated ECMO-SLED on a single intensive care unit at a tertiary healthcare facility between December 2020 and November 2021. The SLED circuits were established between the accessory arterial oxygenator outlets of a double-oxygenator vvECMO setup. Data on filter survival, quality of dialysis, and volume management were collected and compared with an internal control group receiving single SLED.

resultsThis study demonstrates general feasibility of SLED integration into existing vvECMO circuits. Filter lifespans of ECMO-SLED compared with single SLED are significantly prolonged (median 18.3 h vs. 10.3 h, p < 0.01). ECMO-SLED treatment is furthermore able to sufficiently normalize creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and serum sodium, and allows for adequate ultrafiltration rates.

conclusionsWe can show that ECMO-SLED is practical, safe, results in adequate dialysis quality and enables sufficient electrolyte and volume management. Our data indicate that SLED devices can serve as potential alternative to continuous-veno-venous-hemodialysis for integration in vvECMO circuits.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCOVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHybrid Renal Replacement TherapyCritical IllnessFeasibility StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19ECMOECOSMOFRRTSLED

Identifiers

PMID35490349
PMCPMC9347788
OpenAlexW4225250145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.