ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2023
Valve Repair in Aortic Insufficiency: A State-of-the-art Review.
Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative Factors Associated with Delayed Extubation After the Ross Procedure for Aortic Regurgitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Outcomes, survival, mortality, and major adverse events in aortic valve replacement surgeries in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.JTCVS structural and endovascular · 2026Article
- Body mass index and waist-hip ratio - Risk factors for aortic valve disease: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Clinical management of aortic valve regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation: prediction, assessment, and treatment strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A case report of delayed onset of severe aortic regurgitation due to commissural detachment after low-energy blunt chest trauma: timing is key.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Individualized Selection of Valve Intervention Strategies in Aortic Disease Is Key for Better Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Aortic Valve Replacement in the Current Era.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic valve insufficiency (AI) describes the pathology of blood leaking through the aortic valve to the left ventricle during diastole and is classified as mild, moderate or severe according to the volume of regurgitating blood. Intervention is required in severe AI when the patient is symptomatic or when the left ventricular function is impaired. Aortic valve replacement has been considered the gold standard for decades for these patients, but several repair techniques have recently emerged that offer exceptional stability and long-term outcomes. The appropriate method of repair is selected based on the mechanism of AI and each patient's anatomic variations. This review aims to describe different pathologies of AI based on its anatomy, along with the different surgical techniques of aortic repair and their reported results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.