ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022
Adaptive risk-based targeted surveillance for foreign animal diseases at the wildlife-livestock interface.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic Insights into Wildlife Cancer and Conservation Strategies Under the One Health Framework.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- First Detection of Porcine Hemagglutinating Encephalomyelitis Virus (PHEV) in Wild Boars (Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Generation of an Etiology Index Based on Confirmed Tissue Diagnosis Data to Assess Endemic Swine Etiology Activity in the United States of America.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Landscape-scale analysis of raccoon rabies surveillance reveals different drivers of disease dynamics across latitude.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Surveillance Analysis and Sample Size Explorer (SASSE): Learning How to Plan Disease Surveillance in Wildlife.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and economics of foot-and-mouth disease: current understanding and knowledge gaps.Veterinary research · 2025Review
- Expanding National-Scale Wildlife Disease Surveillance Systems With Research Networks.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Quantitative support for the benefits of proactive management for wildlife disease control.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Shared infections at the wildlife-livestock interface and their impact on public health, economy, and biodiversity.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024Article
- African swine fever at the wildlife-livestock interface: challenges for management and outbreak response within invasive wild pigs in the United States.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Disease Progression and Serological Assay Performance in Heritage Breed Pigs followingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Areas within the United States at the Highest Risk for African Swine Fever, Classical Swine Fever, and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Introduction.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2023Article
- Adaptive risk-based targeted surveillance for foreign animal diseases at the wildlife-livestock interface.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal disease surveillance is an important component of the national veterinary infrastructure to protect animal agriculture and facilitates identification of foreign animal disease (FAD) introduction. Once introduced, pathogens shared among domestic and wild animals are especially challenging to manage due to the complex ecology of spillover and spillback. Thus, early identification of FAD in wildlife is critical to minimize outbreak severity and potential impacts on animal agriculture as well as potential impacts on wildlife and biodiversity. As a result, national surveillance and monitoring programs that include wildlife are becoming increasingly common. Designing surveillance systems in wildlife or, more importantly, at the interface of wildlife and domestic animals, is especially challenging because of the frequent lack of ecological and epidemiological data for wildlife species and technical challenges associated with a lack of non-invasive methodologies. To meet the increasing need for targeted FAD surveillance and to address gaps in existing wildlife surveillance systems, we developed an adaptive risk-based targeted surveillance approach that accounts for risks in source and recipient host populations. The approach is flexible, accounts for changing disease risks through time, can be scaled from local to national extents and permits the inclusion of quantitative data or when information is limited to expert opinion. We apply this adaptive risk-based surveillance framework to prioritize areas for surveillance in wild pigs in the United States with the objective of early detection of three diseases: classical swine fever, African swine fever and foot-and-mouth disease. We discuss our surveillance framework, its application to wild pigs and discuss the utility of this framework for surveillance of other host species and diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.