Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35490290›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Adaptive risk-based targeted surveillance for foreign animal diseases at the wildlife-livestock interface.

Ryan S Miller, Sarah N Bevins, Gericke Cook, Ross Free, Kim M Pepin, Thomas Gidlewski, Vienna R Brown

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Quantitative support for the benefits of proactive management for wildlife disease control.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan S MillerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Sarah N BevinsUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Gericke CookUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-787X
Ross FreeUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Veterinary Services, Swine Commodity Health, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Kim M PepinUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-8312
Thomas GidlewskiUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Disease Program, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Vienna R BrownUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Wildlife Services, National Feral Swine Damage Management Program, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2938-3987
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal disease surveillance is an important component of the national veterinary infrastructure to protect animal agriculture and facilitates identification of foreign animal disease (FAD) introduction. Once introduced, pathogens shared among domestic and wild animals are especially challenging to manage due to the complex ecology of spillover and spillback. Thus, early identification of FAD in wildlife is critical to minimize outbreak severity and potential impacts on animal agriculture as well as potential impacts on wildlife and biodiversity. As a result, national surveillance and monitoring programs that include wildlife are becoming increasingly common. Designing surveillance systems in wildlife or, more importantly, at the interface of wildlife and domestic animals, is especially challenging because of the frequent lack of ecological and epidemiological data for wildlife species and technical challenges associated with a lack of non-invasive methodologies. To meet the increasing need for targeted FAD surveillance and to address gaps in existing wildlife surveillance systems, we developed an adaptive risk-based targeted surveillance approach that accounts for risks in source and recipient host populations. The approach is flexible, accounts for changing disease risks through time, can be scaled from local to national extents and permits the inclusion of quantitative data or when information is limited to expert opinion. We apply this adaptive risk-based surveillance framework to prioritize areas for surveillance in wild pigs in the United States with the objective of early detection of three diseases: classical swine fever, African swine fever and foot-and-mouth disease. We discuss our surveillance framework, its application to wild pigs and discuss the utility of this framework for surveillance of other host species and diseases.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseSwine DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideLivestockSus scrofaSwineUnited StatesFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideAfrican swine feverclassical swine feverferal swinefoot-and-mouth diseaseforeign animal diseasesrisktargeted surveillancewild pig

Identifiers

PMID35490290
PMCPMC9790623
OpenAlexW4225261491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.