ArticleBMC medical education2022
Exploring reasons for MD-PhD trainees' experiences of impostor phenomenon.
Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychological Outcomes and Research Engagement Among PhD Students in Medicine and Health Sciences: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Occurrence of Impostor Syndrome in Dentistry Faculty and Related Factors.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Observational
- Forging physician-scientist professional identity: the roles of integration, relationships, and boundary crossing in training.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A student-led MD-PhD program wellness initiative.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Success and Self-Doubt: Prevalence and Predictors of Imposter Phenomenon in a Cohort of Medical Students from Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Deconstructing imposter syndrome among BIPOC genetic counseling students: Insights from a longitudinal qualitative study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Beyond diversity recruitment: Next steps to ensure that underrepresented emergency medicine residents thrive.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Achievability, Representation, and Access to Plastic Surgery Training and Mentorship Among Medical Students.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Prioritizing mental health support for physician-scientist trainees.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Potentialities and challenges of stricto sensu graduate studies in health: A qualitative meta-synthesis.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2025Article
- Building boundary-crossers in clinical-translational research: An exploratory study of a novel communication intervention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Predictors of Job Satisfaction and Association with Psychological Distress Among Academic Medicine Faculty in Kazakhstan.La Medicina del lavoro · 2024Observational
- Prevalence and Predictor of Impostor Phenomenon Among Medical Students at Jouf University, Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2023Article
- Faculty Experiences of the Impostor Phenomenon in STEM Fields.CBE life sciences education · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcceptance into U.S. MD-PhD dual-degree programs is highly competitive, and the lengthy training program requires transitioning between multiple phases (pre-clinical-, PhD-research-, and clinical-training phases), which can be stressful. Challenges faced during MD-PhD training could exacerbate self-doubt and anxiety. Impostor phenomenon is the experience of feeling like a fraud, with some high-achieving, competent individuals attributing their successes to luck or other factors rather than their own ability and hard work. To our knowledge, impostor phenomenon among MD-PhD trainees has not been described. This study examined impostor phenomenon experiences during MD-PhD training and reasons trainees attributed to these feelings.
methodsIndividuals in science and medicine fields participated in an online survey that included the 20-item Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS); higher scores (range 20-100) indicate more frequent impostor phenomenon. Some respondents who reported experiencing impostor phenomenon also voluntarily completed a semi-structured interview, sharing experiences during training that contributed to feelings of impostor phenomenon. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed using the constant comparative method and analytic induction to identify themes.
resultsOf 959 survey respondents (students and professionals in science and medicine), 13 MD-PhD students and residents completed the survey, nine of whom (five male, four female; four white, five other race-ethnicity) also completed an interview. These participants experienced moderate-to-intense scores on the CIPS (range: 46-96). Four themes emerged from the interview narratives that described participants' experiences of IP: professional identity formation, fear of evaluation, minority status, and, program-transition experiences. All reported struggling to develop a physician-scientist identity and lacking a sense of belonging in medicine or research.
conclusionsImpostor experiences that MD-PhD participants attributed to bias and micro-aggressions in social interactions with peers, faculty, and patients challenged their professional identity formation as physician-scientists. It is important to further examine how MD-PhD-program structures, cultures, and social interactions can lead to feelings of alienation and experiences of impostor phenomenon, particularly for students from diverse and underrepresented populations in medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.