Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35489595›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2022

Diagnosis of COVID-19 via acoustic analysis and artificial intelligence by monitoring breath sounds on smartphones.

Zhiang Chen, Muyun Li, Ruoyu Wang, Wenzhuo Sun, Jiayi Liu, Haiyang Li, Tianxin Wang, Yuan Lian, Jiaqian Zhang, Xinheng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Omicron detection with large language models and YouTube audio data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhiang ChenSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Muyun LiSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Ruoyu WangSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Wenzhuo SunSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Jiayi LiuSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Haiyang LiSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Tianxin WangSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Yuan LianSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Jiaqian ZhangSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Xinheng WangSchool of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China. Electronic address: xinheng.wang@xjtlu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific evidence shows that acoustic analysis could be an indicator for diagnosing COVID-19. From analyzing recorded breath sounds on smartphones, it is discovered that patients with COVID-19 have different patterns in both the time domain and frequency domain. These patterns are used in this paper to diagnose the infection of COVID-19. Statistics of the sound signals, analysis in the frequency domain, and Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are then calculated and applied in two classifiers, k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), to diagnose whether a user is contracted with COVID-19 or not. Test results show that, amazingly, an accuracy of over 97% could be achieved with a CNN classifier and more than 85% on kNN with optimized features. Optimization methods for selecting the best features and using various metrics to evaluate the performance are also demonstrated in this paper. Owing to the high accuracy of the CNN model, the CNN model was implemented in an Android app to diagnose COVID-19 with a probability to indicate the confidence level. The initial medical test shows a similar test result between the method proposed in this paper and the lateral flow method, which indicates that the proposed method is feasible and effective. Because of the use of breath sound and tested on the smartphone, this method could be used by everybody regardless of the availability of other medical resources, which could be a powerful tool for society to diagnose COVID-19.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19AcousticsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRespiratory SoundsSmartphoneAcoustic analysisBreath soundConvolutional Neural Network (CNN)COVID-19k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)

Identifiers

PMID35489595
PMCPMC9044719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.