ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2022
Diagnosis of COVID-19 via acoustic analysis and artificial intelligence by monitoring breath sounds on smartphones.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and knowledge mapping on ICT-based remote and automatic COVID-19 patient monitoring and care.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Feasibility of wearable sensor signals and self-reported symptoms to prompt at-home testing for acute respiratory viruses in the USA (DETECT-AHEAD): a decentralised, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Digital health · 2024Trial
- Construction and Validation of an Automatic Segmentation Method for Respiratory Sound Time Labels.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Generative AI and unstructured audio data for precision public health.npj health systems · 2025Article
- AI Hesitancy and Acceptability-Perceptions of AI Chatbots for Chronic Health Management and Long COVID Support: Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Omicron detection with large language models and YouTube audio data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Combating Covid-19 using machine learning and deep learning: Applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Array (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific evidence shows that acoustic analysis could be an indicator for diagnosing COVID-19. From analyzing recorded breath sounds on smartphones, it is discovered that patients with COVID-19 have different patterns in both the time domain and frequency domain. These patterns are used in this paper to diagnose the infection of COVID-19. Statistics of the sound signals, analysis in the frequency domain, and Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are then calculated and applied in two classifiers, k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), to diagnose whether a user is contracted with COVID-19 or not. Test results show that, amazingly, an accuracy of over 97% could be achieved with a CNN classifier and more than 85% on kNN with optimized features. Optimization methods for selecting the best features and using various metrics to evaluate the performance are also demonstrated in this paper. Owing to the high accuracy of the CNN model, the CNN model was implemented in an Android app to diagnose COVID-19 with a probability to indicate the confidence level. The initial medical test shows a similar test result between the method proposed in this paper and the lateral flow method, which indicates that the proposed method is feasible and effective. Because of the use of breath sound and tested on the smartphone, this method could be used by everybody regardless of the availability of other medical resources, which could be a powerful tool for society to diagnose COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.