Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35489361›Full record

ReviewLancet (London, England)2022

Improving health and social systems for all children in LMICs: structural innovations to deliver high-quality services.

Margaret E Kruk, Todd P Lewis, Catherine Arsenault, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Grace Irimu, Joshua Jeong, Zohra S Lassi, Susan M Sawyer, Tyler Vaivada, Peter Waiswa and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margaret E KrukDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mkruk@hsph.harvard.edu.
Todd P LewisDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Catherine ArsenaultDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health and Institute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Grace IrimuKenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joshua JeongDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Zohra S LassiRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Susan M SawyerDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tyler VaivadaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter WaiswaMaternal, Newborn and Child Health Centre of Excellence, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aisha K YousafzaiDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite health gains over the past 30 years, children and adolescents are not reaching their health potential in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In addition to health systems, social systems, such as schools, communities, families, and digital platforms, can be used to promote health. We did a targeted literature review of how well health and social systems are meeting the needs of children in LMICs using the framework of The Lancet Global Health Commission on high-quality health systems and we reviewed evidence for structural reforms in health and social sectors. We found that quality of services for children is substandard across both health and social systems. Health systems have deficits in care competence (eg, diagnosis and management), system competence (eg, timeliness, continuity, and referral), user experience (eg, respect and usability), service provision for common and serious conditions (eg, cancer, trauma, and mental health), and service offerings for adolescents. Education and social services for child health are limited by low funding and poor coordination with other sectors. Structural reforms are more likely to improve service quality substantially and at scale than are micro-level efforts. Promising approaches include governing for quality (eg, leadership, expert management, and learning systems), redesigning service delivery to maximise outcomes, and empowering families to better care for children and to demand quality care from health and social systems. Additional research is needed on health needs across the life course, health system performance for children and families, and large-scale evaluation of promising health and social programmes.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PromotionAdolescentChildHumansMental HealthPovertySocial Work

Identifiers

PMID35489361
PMCPMC9077444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.