ArticleTranslational oncology2022
Evaluation of different staging systems and prognostic analysis of nasal-type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma based on consistent LVDP chemotherapy regimen.
Article in Translational oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Comparison of clinical characteristics between nasal cavity and sinus NK/T-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical Manifestations, Prognostic Factors, and Outcomes of Extranodal Natural Killer T-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience in Thailand.Hematology reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Treatment of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: From past to future.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nasal-type extranodal NK-T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The optimal staging system for it remains undefined. In this study, we evaluated different staging systems in 205 patients with nasal-type ENKTL based on a consistent LVDP (L-asparaginase, etoposide, dexamethasone, cisplatin) regimen. All patients were staged by Ann Arbor staging system (AASS) and CA staging system (CASS). Their characteristics, treatment responses, survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and prognostic values of AASS and CASS were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 78 months. All patients received a median 4 cycles of the LVDP chemotherapy. Based on CASS, patients with stages I through IV were more evenly distributed than with AASS, and numbered at 56 (27.3%), 70 (33.2%), 45 (21.9%), and 34 (17.6%), respectively. At the end of therapy, the objective response rate (ORR) was 81.2% for all patients. For all patients, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 61.6% and 67.8%. According to AASS, the 5-year OS of patients with stages Ⅰ through Ⅳ were 77.9%, 61.2%, 60.0%, and 38.7%, respectively (χ²=20.578, p<0.001). Based on CASS, the 5-year OS of patients with stages Ⅰ to Ⅳ were 89.1%, 65.5%, 58.6%, and 45.4%, respectively (χ²=22.973, p<0.001). In ROC analysis of OS, the area under the curve (AUC) for CASS was 0.70 and 0.64 for AASS. CASS was better in discriminating survival than AASS (p = 0.018). In conclusion, the LVDP regimen is effective for nasal-type ENKTL and the CASS has a better prognostic value in survival analysis than the AASS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.