ReviewJournal of clinical psychopharmacology
Central Nervous System Trial Failures: Using the Fragile X Syndrome-mGluR5 Drug Target to Highlight the Complexities of Translating Preclinical Discoveries Into Human Trials.
Review in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translational Paradox of Triplet Repeat Expansion Disorders: Synthesizing Clinical Trial Failures to Guide Future Therapeutics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Cryo-EM Structures of Brain-Derived G Protein-Coupled Receptors: The First Direct Visualization from Mammalian Brain Tissue.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bioisostere-Driven Discovery of SePP: A Selenium-Containing Polypharmacological Agent Relevant to Fragile X Syndrome.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Unraveling mGluR5 dysfunction in autism spectrum disorder: a multi-level analysis of genetic, molecular, and neurobiological mechanisms.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Blarcamesine improves EEG biomarkers of cortical dysfunction in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Precision diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Therapeutic strategies for fragile X syndrome and implications for other gene-silencing disorders.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Drug Treatments for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Targeting Signaling Pathways and Homeostasis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Finding new and better treatments for psychiatric disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Activation of mGluR1 negatively modulates glutamate-induced phase shifts of the circadian pacemaker in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2023Article
- Role of the endocannabinoid system in fragile X syndrome: potential mechanisms for benefit from cannabidiol treatment.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PURPOSE/
backgroundDrug trials of the central nervous system(CNS) have been plagued with uninformative failures, often because of the difficulties of knowing definitively whether dosing achieved was sufficient to modulate the intended CNS target at adequate concentrations to produce pharmacodynamic or dose-related changes in readouts of brain function. Key design elements can be introduced into early-stage trials to get at this issue. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This commentary builds on a review of earlier clinical studies in Fragile X syndrome to explore the extent to which the chain of evidence is in place to allow for interpretation of the results as ruling in or out the utility of modulating one or another molecular target to treat this disorder. Recent and current biomarker studies in Fragile X syndrome occurring subsequent to the clinical studies are reviewed to see if they might address any chain of evidence gaps. FINDINGS/
resultsDespite the strong preclinical basis for targeting molecular mechanisms, the lack of efficacy seen in clinical studies remains uninterpretable, with regard to ruling in or out the utility of targeting the mechanism in a clinical population, given the absence of studies, which address whether doses of administered drug impacted the targeted brain mechanism. IMPLICATIONS/
conclusionsThe value of pursuing clinical studies of compounds targeted to novel mechanisms in the absence of clinical pharmacological evidence of some anticipated mediating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic signals is questionable. One or more biomarkers of a drug effect on brain function are needed to establish dose dependent CNS effects that allow one to interpret clinical results as ruling in or out a mechanism and providing a firm basis for continuing or not, as well as informing dose selection in any clinical efficacy trials. Initiatives to address this general need in pediatric psychopharmacology are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.