ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Controversies in Management.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound and radiographic outcomes of the Coxaflex brace in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH): a multicentre prospective study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Interpreting the emerging role of quantitative perfusion assessment after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Residual Acetabular Dysplasia in Young Children: a Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Management.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Minimally-Invasive Dega Osteotomy in Ambulatory Pediatric Patients With Residual Developmental Dysplasia of the Hips-A Technique and Prospective Case Series.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Deciphering the past status and future tendency: a comprehensive scientometric study on developmental dysplasia of the hip.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- CORR Insights®: Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Open reduction after failed closed reduction following failed Pavlik harness treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip: One- or two-stage?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- A novel quantitative approach to evaluate femoral head perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A pilot study in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip.IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · 2023Article
- Biomechanical analysis and clinical observation of 3D-printed acetabular prosthesis for the acetabular reconstruction of total hip arthroplasty in Crowe III hip dysplasia.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMany aspects of developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) care and evaluation are still active areas of debate. Recent studies have provided more insight into these topics such as strategies for reducing osteonecrosis, assessing hip reduction after closed and open reduction, and the management of residual acetabular dysplasia. RECENT
findingsThe presence of the ossific nucleus at the time of reduction does not alter the risk of osteonecrosis. The risk of osteonecrosis may be higher when hips are immobilized in excessive abduction. Limited sequence MRI may be the best choice for assessing hip reduction after closed and open reduction; however, new technologies are emerging such as 3D fluoroscopy and perfusion MRI. The treatment of residual acetabular dysplasia with bracing has been shown to be effective and the decision to perform a pelvic osteotomy is based on patient-specific factors. The spectrum of DDH treatment has evolved over the past several decades. Recent studies have provided insights into strategies for osteonecrosis prevention, hip evaluation during after reduction, and the management of residual acetabular dysplasia. However, there is ample room for additional and more rigorous studies guiding advanced imaging for assessing hip reduction such as 3D fluoroscopy and perfusion MRI, as well as the management of residual acetabular dysplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.