Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488937›Full record

ReviewMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2022

An evaluation of the National Institutes of Health grants portfolio: identifying opportunities and challenges for multi-omics research that leverage metabolomics data.

Catherine T Yu, Brittany N Chao, Rolando Barajas, Majda Haznadar, Padma Maruvada, Holly L Nicastro, Sharon A Ross, Mukesh Verma, Scott Rogers, Krista A Zanetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catherine T YuDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3735-8041
Brittany N ChaoOffice of Workforce Planning and Development, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0355-2332
Rolando BarajasDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8579-4350
Majda HaznadarLaboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9431-0784
Padma MaruvadaDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-2056
Holly L NicastroOffice of Nutrition Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sharon A RossDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Mukesh VermaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Scott RogersDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Krista A ZanettiDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. zanettik@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4050-8461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThrough the systematic large-scale profiling of metabolites, metabolomics provides a tool for biomarker discovery and improving disease monitoring, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response, as well as for delineating disease mechanisms and etiology. As a downstream product of the genome and epigenome, transcriptome, and proteome activity, the metabolome can be considered as being the most proximal correlate to the phenotype. Integration of metabolomics data with other -omics data in multi-omics analyses has the potential to advance understanding of human disease development and treatment. AIM OF REVIEW: To understand the current funding and potential research opportunities for when metabolomics is used in human multi-omics studies, we cross-sectionally evaluated National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded grants to examine the use of metabolomics data when collected with at least one other -omics data type. First, we aimed to determine what types of multi-omics studies included metabolomics data collection. Then, we looked at those multi-omics studies to examine how often grants employed an integrative analysis approach using metabolomics data. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: We observed that the majority of NIH-funded multi-omics studies that include metabolomics data performed integration, but to a limited extent, with integration primarily incorporating only one other -omics data type. Some opportunities to improve data integration may include increasing confidence in metabolite identification, as well as addressing variability between -omics approach requirements and -omics data incompatibility.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMetabolomicsMetabolomeNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)ProteomeUnited StatesProteomeData integrationMetabolomicsMulti-omicsNIH funding

Identifiers

PMID35488937
PMCPMC9056487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.