Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488932›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022

Pseudomonas putida and its close relatives: mixing and mastering the perfect tune for plants.

Stefanie Bernardette Costa-Gutierrez, Conrado Adler, Manuel Espinosa-Urgel, Ricardo Ezequiel de Cristóbal

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Application ofPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Exogenous KFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie Bernardette Costa-GutierrezPlanta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiológicos (PROIMI-CONICET), Avenida Belgrano Y Pasaje Caseros, 4000, San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
Conrado AdlerInstituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (INSIBIO, CONICET-UNT) E Instituto de Química Biológica "Dr. Bernabé Bloj", Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, 461, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Chacabuco, Tucumán, Argentina.
Manuel Espinosa-UrgelDepartment of Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.
Ricardo Ezequiel de CristóbalInstituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (INSIBIO, CONICET-UNT) E Instituto de Química Biológica "Dr. Bernabé Bloj", Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, 461, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Chacabuco, Tucumán, Argentina. ricadecristo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-6298
National University of Tucumán · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AREstación Experimental del Zaidín · ES

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el desarrollo tecnológico y la innovación PICT 2018-03552Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-109372GB-I00 (MCIN/ AEI /10.13039/501100011033)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are a group of microorganisms of utmost interest in agricultural biotechnology for their stimulatory and protective effects on plants. Among the various PGPR species, some Pseudomonas putida strains combine outstanding traits such as phytohormone synthesis, nutrient solubilization, adaptation to different stress conditions, and excellent root colonization ability. In this review, we summarize the state of the art and the most relevant findings related to P. putida and its close relatives as PGPR, and we have compiled a detailed list of P. putida sensu stricto, sensu lato, and close relative strains that have been studied for their plant growth-promoting characteristics. However, the mere in vitro analysis of these characteristics does not guarantee correct plant performance under in vivo or field conditions. Therefore, the importance of studying adhesion and survival in the rhizosphere, as well as responses to environmental factors, is emphasized. Although numerous strains of this species have shown good performance in field trials, their use in commercial products is still very limited. Thus, we also analyze the opportunities and challenges related to the formulation and application of bioproducts based on these bacteria. KEY POINTS: •The mini-review updates the knowledge on Pseudomonas putida as a PGPR. • Some rhizosphere strains are able to improve plant growth under stress conditions. • The metabolic versatility of this species encourages the development of a bioproduct.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas putidaPlant DevelopmentPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant RootsPlantsRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyPlant Growth RegulatorsAbiotic stressBiocontrolPlant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)Pseudomonas putidaSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID35488932
PMCPMC9151500
OpenAlexW4225143927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.