Trial reportActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022
Quantitative pupillometry in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A post-hoc analysis of the TTH48 trial.
Trial report in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2025: post-resuscitation care.Intensive care medicine · 2025Guideline
- Pooled it
- Quantitative pupillometry in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A post-hoc analysis of the TTH48 trial.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2022Trial
- Article
- Is quantitative pupillometry affected by ambient light? A prospective crossover study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
- The capacity of neurological pupil index to predict the absence of somatosensory evoked potentials after cardiac arrest - An observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Neuromonitoring after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Cerebral Physiology and Injury Stratification.Neurocritical care · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative pupillometry is an objective method to examine pupil reaction and subsequently grade the response on a neurological pupil index (NPi) scale from 0 to 5. The aim of the present sub-study was to explore the long-term prognostic value of NPi in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing targeted temperature management (TTM).
methodsThis planned sub-study of the "Targeted temperature management for 48 versus 24 h and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized clinical trial." NPi was assessed from admission and throughout day 3 and linked to the Cerebral Performance Categories score at 6 months. We compared the prognostic performance of NPi in 65 patients randomized to a target temperature of 33 ± 1°C for 24 or 48 h.
resultsThe NPi values were not different between TTM groups (p > .05). When data were pooled, NPi was strongly associated with neurological outcome at day 1 with a mean NPi of 3.6 (95% CI 3.4-3.8) versus NPi 3.9 (3.6-4.1) in the poor versus good outcome group, respectively (p < .01). At day 2, NPi values were 3.6 (3.1-4.0) and 4.1 (3.9-4.2) (p = .01) and at day 3, the values were 3.3 (2.6-4.0) and 4.3 (4.1-4.6), respectively (p < .01). The prognostic ability of NPi, defined by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was best at day three.
conclusionQuantitative pupillometry measured by NPi was not different in the two TTM groups, but overall, significantly associated with good and poor neurological outcomes at 6 months. NPI has a promising diagnostic accuracy, but larger studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.