ReviewProblemy endokrinologii2022
[Clinical and radiological diagnosis of hypophysitis: a review of literature and own data].
Review in Problemy endokrinologii, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Case Report of HIV-Associated Pituitary Lymphoma and Review of the Literature.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- A Toluene-induced Infundibulo-neuro-hypophysitis: Presentation of a New Cause of Hypophysitis Secondary to Toxic Exposure and Review on Toluene Inhalation Endocrine Effects.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- [Hypophisitis in pregnant women with persistent diabetes insipidus in the outcome].Problemy endokrinologii · 2024Article
- [Differential diagnosis and tactics of managing a patient with primary hypophysitis on the example of a clinical case].Problemy endokrinologii · 2024Article
- Secondary xanthogranulomatous hypophysitis mimicking a pituitary macroadenoma: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a literature review of the various forms of hypophysitis, its varieties, as well as the problem of radiation diagnosis and treatment of this pathology. Hypophysitis is a poorly understood and multifactorial disease which the difficulty of diagnosing is not only to a variety of nonspecific clinical manifestations and hormonal research data, but also the ambiguous results of MRI studies, the lack of clear MR patterns. The article reflects the main histological types of hypophysitis, the peculiarities of diagnosis in connection with general clinical symptoms, outlines the features of each type of hypophysitis with their own clinical observations. This review is devoted to modern ideas about the clinical course of hypophysitis, presented a set of characteristic diagnostic signs of the disease according to MRI and the treatment algorithms recommended today are also highlighted. The article summarizes data from foreign literature and our own clinical observations in order to develop an optimal protocol for MRI studies in patients with suspected hypophysitis, to develop recommendations for radiologists and endocrinologists for the correct results interpretation. The uniqueness of this review is the lack of data on the clinic, diagnosis and treatment of hypophysitis in the Russian literature today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.