ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
A Survey of Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) practices in India.
Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and major adverse events of endobronchial ultrasound performed under conscious sedation: Insights from 3,454 procedures over 14 years and a systematic review of literature.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- EBUS-TBNA needles: A path to affordable safety.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025Article
- Re-use of EBUS needles: The elephant in the room.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025Article
- Clinical application of endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy-a single center, large sample, real-world study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Controversies in endobronchial ultrasound.Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
- Transesophageal EUS of mediastinal and pulmonary lesions: An Italian survey from i-EUS Working Group.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of data on the prevalent practices of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in India. Aim: To study the current practices of EBUS-TBNA in India. Methods: This survey was an online questionnaire designed on the Google forms interface. The survey included various questions related to demographics, sedation, analgesia and anesthesia, technical aspects, and infection control related to the procedure of EBUS-TBNA. Results: Data from 134 respondents (mean age: 42.2 years) were analyzed. Most (97.8%) were pulmonologists or physicians, and a majority (94.8%) practicing in either a private multi-specialty setting or medical college. 40.3% had received procedure training at a formal training program. Mild/moderate sedation was the most common strategy (70.1%). Midazolam (76.7%), Fentanyl (76.0%), followed by propofol (46.5%), were the most frequent drugs, and 82.8% preferred combination sedation. 26.1% used cricothyroid lignocaine injection, and the use of 1% or 2% lignocaine for spray-as-you-go administration was similar. The oral route was preferred, while the laryngeal mask airway was the most common airway conduit under general anesthesia. Suspected granulomatous mediastinal lymphadenopathy (TB/sarcoidosis) (67.2%), followed by lung cancer (32.8%), were the most common indications of EBUS-TBNA. 81.3% performed EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer staging. 21 G needle was preferred (64.9%), and vacuum suction was common (80.6%). 55.2% routinely performed ROSE. Alcohol fixed glass slide smears were the most common method (93.1%) for cytological preparation. 49.3% also performed EUS-B-FNA. 76.9% routinely obtained endo bronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. Elastography was infrequently used. Nearly three-fourths (77.6%) reused EBUS needles. Conclusion: There is practice variability in the multiple aspects related technical performance of EBUS-TBNA. Evidence-based guidelines addressing the multiple technical aspects are required to standardize the practice of EBUS-TBNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.