Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488680›Full record

ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society

A Survey of Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) practices in India.

Karan Madan, Saurabh Mittal, Pawan Tiwari, Vijay Hadda, Anant Mohan, Randeep Guleria

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. EBUS-TBNA needles: A path to affordable safety.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Re-use of EBUS needles: The elephant in the room.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karan MadanDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Saurabh MittalDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pawan TiwariDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vijay HaddaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anant MohanDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Randeep GuleriaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of data on the prevalent practices of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in India. Aim: To study the current practices of EBUS-TBNA in India. Methods: This survey was an online questionnaire designed on the Google forms interface. The survey included various questions related to demographics, sedation, analgesia and anesthesia, technical aspects, and infection control related to the procedure of EBUS-TBNA. Results: Data from 134 respondents (mean age: 42.2 years) were analyzed. Most (97.8%) were pulmonologists or physicians, and a majority (94.8%) practicing in either a private multi-specialty setting or medical college. 40.3% had received procedure training at a formal training program. Mild/moderate sedation was the most common strategy (70.1%). Midazolam (76.7%), Fentanyl (76.0%), followed by propofol (46.5%), were the most frequent drugs, and 82.8% preferred combination sedation. 26.1% used cricothyroid lignocaine injection, and the use of 1% or 2% lignocaine for spray-as-you-go administration was similar. The oral route was preferred, while the laryngeal mask airway was the most common airway conduit under general anesthesia. Suspected granulomatous mediastinal lymphadenopathy (TB/sarcoidosis) (67.2%), followed by lung cancer (32.8%), were the most common indications of EBUS-TBNA. 81.3% performed EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer staging. 21 G needle was preferred (64.9%), and vacuum suction was common (80.6%). 55.2% routinely performed ROSE. Alcohol fixed glass slide smears were the most common method (93.1%) for cytological preparation. 49.3% also performed EUS-B-FNA. 76.9% routinely obtained endo bronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. Elastography was infrequently used. Nearly three-fourths (77.6%) reused EBUS needles. Conclusion: There is practice variability in the multiple aspects related technical performance of EBUS-TBNA. Evidence-based guidelines addressing the multiple technical aspects are required to standardize the practice of EBUS-TBNA.

Indexed as

Anesthesiabronchoscopyendobronchial ultrasoundendobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspirationtransbronchial needle aspiration

Identifiers

PMID35488680
PMCPMC9200193
OpenAlexW4225247902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.