Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488668›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of andrology

New model of PIRADS and adjusted prostatespecific antigen density of peripheral zone improves the detection rate of initial prostate biopsy: a diagnostic study.

Chen Huang, Zong-Qiang Cai, Feng Qiu, Jin-Xian Pu, Qi-Lin Xi, Xue-Dong Wei, Xi-Ming Wang, Xiao-Jun Zhao, Lin-Chuan Guo, Jian-Quan Hou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chen HuangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Zong-Qiang CaiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Feng QiuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Jin-Xian PuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Qi-Lin XiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Xue-Dong WeiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Xi-Ming WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Xiao-Jun ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Lin-Chuan GuoDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Jian-Quan HouDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Yu-Hua HuangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored a new model of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) and adjusted prostate-specific antigen density of peripheral zone (aPSADPZ) for predicting the occurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The demographic and clinical characteristics of 853 patients were recorded. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), PSAD of peripheral zone (PSADPZ), aPSADPZ, and peripheral zone volume ratio (PZ-ratio) were calculated and subjected to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The calibration and discrimination abilities of new nomograms were verified with the calibration curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC). The clinical benefits of these models were evaluated by decision curve analysis and clinical impact curves. The AUCs of PSA, PSAD, PSADPZ, aPSADPZ, and PZ-ratio were 0.669, 0.762, 0.659, 0.812, and 0.748 for PCa diagnosis, while 0.713, 0.788, 0.694, 0.828, and 0.735 for csPCa diagnosis, respectively. All nomograms displayed higher net benefit and better overall calibration than the scenarios for predicting the occurrence of PCa or csPCa. The new model significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of PCa (0.945 vs 0.830, P < 0.01) and csPCa (0.937 vs 0.845, P < 0.01) compared with the base model. In addition, the number of patients with PCa and csPCa predicted by the new model was in good agreement with the actual number of patients with PCa and csPCa in high-risk threshold. This study demonstrates that aPSADPZ has a higher predictive accuracy for PCa diagnosis than the conventional indicators. Combining aPSADPZ with PIRADS can improve PCa diagnosis and avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMaleNomogramsProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific Antigenadjusted prostate-specific antigen density of peripheral zonebiopsydiagnosisprostate cancerProstate Imaging Reporting and Data System

Identifiers

PMID35488668
PMCPMC9933967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.