Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488516›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2022

Diagnostic performance of gliomas grading and IDH status decoding A comparison between 3D amide proton transfer APT and four diffusion-weighted MRI models.

Hu Guo, Jun Liu, JunJiao Hu, HuiTing Zhang, Wei Zhao, Min Gao, Yi Zhang, Guang Yang, Yan Cui

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hu GuoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-6501
Jun LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7851-6782
JunJiao HuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
HuiTing ZhangMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Wuhan, 430071, China.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8520-2087
Min GaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6588-5936
Yi ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8738-1851
Guang YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yan CuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Rd, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, P.R. China.
Central South University · CNEast China Normal University · CNSiemens Healthcare (United States) · USZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe focus of neuro-oncology research has changed from histopathologic grading to molecular characteristics, and medical imaging routinely follows this change. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of amide proton transfer (APT) and four diffusion models in gliomas grading and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genotype. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: A total of 62 participants (37 males, 25 females; mean age, 52 ± 13 years) whose IDH genotypes were mutant in 6 of 14 grade II gliomas, 8 of 20 of grade III gliomas, and 4 of 28 grade IV gliomas. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: APT imaging using sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) and DWI with q-space Cartesian grid sampling were acquired at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: The ability of diffusion kurtosis imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), and APT imaging for glioma grade and IDH status were assessed, with histopathological grade and genetic testing used as a reference standard. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn by two neuroradiologists after consensus. STATISTICAL TESTS: T-test and Mann-Whitney U test; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); receiver operating curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC); DeLong test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsCompared with IDH-mutant gliomas, IDH-wildtype gliomas showed a significantly higher mean, 5th-percentile (APT DATA

conclusionAPT has higher diagnostic accuracy than DTI, DKI, MAP, and NODDI in glioma IDH genotype. APT EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaAdultAgedAmidesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDimapritFemaleHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesAmidesAPTDimapritIsocitrate DehydrogenaseProtonsadvanced diffusion modelsamide proton transfer imagingglioma gradingIDH statusmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35488516
PMCPMC9790544
OpenAlexW4225130932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.