Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488491›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2022

Blended learning in a biology classroom: Pre-pandemic insights for post-pandemic instructional strategies.

Irtaza Tahir, Victoria Van Mierlo, Victoria Radauskas, Wayne Yeung, Alastair Tracey, Rosa da Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irtaza TahirFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Victoria Van MierloDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9472-7934
Victoria RadauskasArts & Science Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Wayne YeungDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Alastair TraceyDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Rosa da SilvaDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7564-6880
McMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is increasingly important to utilize novel approaches to improve student learning. This has become especially relevant throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies have shown positive outcomes of blended learning on student satisfaction. Yet, there are limited data in the field of biology on how blended learning practices correlate with overall student performance. Moreover, there is a dearth of information on student perceptions about how blended learning has impacted their education. Through this study, we present insights on the impact of blended learning in a first-year cell and molecular biology course. Using mixed-methods research, we evaluated the impact of a blended learning course format on student performance in the learning categories of knowledge and understanding, communication and application, and critical thinking and inquiry. Using a pre- vs. postintervention analysis, we show that a blended learning course model does not change students' performance on multiple-choice and short answer assessments when compared to a nonblended learning course model. Through a qualitative assessment of student perceptions and sentiments, however, the implemented blended learning approach does appear to provide significant perceived benefits, including learner flexibility, consolidation of content, and the opportunity to apply course content to the 'real world'. While we recognize that our report describes a very specific blended learning model, we believe that our findings are generalizable to similar introductory courses. As such, we are confident that our case study will provide course designers with a useful foundation to build future blended learning courses.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBiologyEducational MeasurementHumansLearningbiologyblended learningflexibilitymixed-methods researchonline learningundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID35488491
PMCPMC9249331
OpenAlexW4225117536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.