Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488436›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2022

Risk factors and outcome in dogs with recurrent massive hepatocellular carcinoma: A Veterinary Society of Surgical Oncology case-control study.

Janis M Lapsley, Vincent Wavreille, Sabrina Barry, Josephine A Dornbusch, Carolyn Chen, Haley Leeper, Judith Bertran, Diane Scavelli, Julius M Liptak, Chris Wood and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Massive hepatoma treated with curative-intent liver lobectomy in a standard poodle dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Janis M LapsleyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Vincent WavreilleDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sabrina BarryVirginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Josephine A DornbuschDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Carolyn ChenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Haley LeeperDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-0851
Judith BertranDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5886-208X
Diane ScavelliDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Julius M LiptakCapital City Small Animal Mobile Surgery, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Chris WoodAlta Vista Animal Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Shelly ShamirDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA.
Claire RosenbaumDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA.
Vincenzo MontinaroSoft Tissue Surgery Department, Clinica Veterinaria Malpensa-AniCura, Samarate, Italy.
Brandan Wustefeld-JanssensFlint Animal Cancer Center and Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-1735
Allyson StermanDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA.
Colin ChikCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Ameet SinghDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Josh CollinsSurgery Department, Metropolitan Veterinary Hospital, Copley, Ohio, USA.
Laura E SelmicDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-6273
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USAnimal Diseases Research Institute · TZAssociação Brasileira de Oncologia Veterinária · BRCornell University · USDeutsche Telekom (Austria) · ATEuropean Broadcasting Union · CHHospital Metropolitano · ECHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USOregon State University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Guelph · CAVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local recurrence after surgical excision of canine massive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been poorly studied in veterinary medicine with scant information published regarding risk factors for and outcome following recurrence. The aim of this case-control study was to describe the time to recurrence, evaluate potential risk factors for recurrence, and report the outcome in dogs with massive HCC. Medical records for 75 dogs who developed recurrence and 113 dogs who did not develop recurrence were reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed to determine risk factors for recurrence as well as the median time to develop recurrence and overall survival time (OS). None of the risk factors evaluated were significant for the development of recurrence. The median time to develop recurrence was 367 days (range 32-2096 days). There was no significant difference in median OS for dogs who developed recurrence vs. those who did not (851 vs. 970 days). For dogs with recurrent HCC, treatment at recurrence trended toward prolonged OS but was not significantly different from dogs not undergoing treatment at recurrence. There was no significant difference in median OS for dogs with histologically complete vs. incomplete tumour excision (990 vs. 903 days). Although specific risk factors for recurrence were not identified, elevations in liver values were noted in patients with recurrent disease and could act as a noninvasive surveillance tool. Recurrence was noted earlier in dogs who had routine post-operative surveillance (228 vs. 367 days). Routine surveillance for recurrence is recommended especially in dogs where further intervention is possible and should extend beyond 1 year. Patients with massive HCC have a good long-term prognosis regardless of incomplete excision, pulmonary metastasis, or recurrent local disease.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDog DiseasesLiver NeoplasmsSurgical OncologyAnimalsCase-Control StudiesDogsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocieties, VeterinaryTreatment Outcomedoghepatocellular carcinomalocal recurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID35488436
PMCPMC9546275
OpenAlexW4225127238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.