ArticleClinical epigenetics2022
Batch-effect detection, correction and characterisation in Illumina HumanMethylation450 and MethylationEPIC BeadChip array data.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Decoding depression: a comprehensive multi-cohort exploration of blood DNA methylation using machine learning and deep learning approaches.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Best practices for using biological data in psychological research.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Review
- Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a prospective nested case-control study.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- DNA methylation biomarkers-based pan-cancer classifier: predictive modeling for cancer classification.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Whole genome methylation profiling of menstrual stem cells identifies novel biomarkers for endometriosis.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- From Spatial Epigenomes to Clinical Diagnostics: Integrative Methylomics Across Scales and Modalities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- DNA methylation profiling predicts postsurgical regrowth in SF1-lineage nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Alcohol Consumption and DNA Methylation in a Mediterranean Cohort: A Focus on Oxidative Stress and Aging Biomarkers.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Associations Between Non-Genetic Risk Factors and DNA Methylation Alterations in Barrett's Esophagus and Its Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- From population science to the clinic? Limits of epigenetic clocks as personal biomarkers.Epigenomics · 2025Article
- Dynamic DNA methylation changes during colorectal oncogenesis with insights from adenoma stages.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DNA methylation and telomere length in 2-5 year olds with intrauterine preeclampsia exposure: a P4 sub-study.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Advancing atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry applications: a multifaceted approach to optimising clinical data set generation.The Analyst · 2025Article
- ComBat-met: adjusting batch effects in DNA methylation data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- DNA methylation patterns and predictive models for metabolic disease risk in offspring of gestational diabetes mellitus.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Methylation Risk Score Modelling in Endometriosis: Evidence for Non-Genetic DNA Methylation Effects in a Case-Control Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A SuperLearner-based pipeline for the development of DNA methylation-derived predictors of phenotypic traits.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- EpiAge: a next-generation sequencing-basedAging · 2025Article
- Analysis of Epigenome-Wide Association Studies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- DNA methylation in esophageal cancer: technological advances and early detection clinical applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic technologies can be subject to significant batch-effects which are known to reduce experimental power and to potentially create false positive results. The Illumina Infinium Methylation BeadChip is a popular technology choice for epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS), but presently, little is known about the nature of batch-effects on these designs. Given the subtlety of biological phenotypes in many EWAS, control for batch-effects should be a consideration.
resultsUsing the batch-effect removal approaches in the ComBat and Harman software, we examined two in-house datasets and compared results with three large publicly available datasets, (1214 HumanMethylation450 and 1094 MethylationEPIC BeadChips in total), and find that despite various forms of preprocessing, some batch-effects persist. This residual batch-effect is associated with the day of processing, the individual glass slide and the position of the array on the slide. Consistently across all datasets, 4649 probes required high amounts of correction. To understand the impact of this set to EWAS studies, we explored the literature and found three instances where persistently batch-effect prone probes have been reported in abstracts as key sites of differential methylation. As well as batch-effect susceptible probes, we also discover a set of probes which are erroneously corrected. We provide batch-effect workflows for Infinium Methylation data and provide reference matrices of batch-effect prone and erroneously corrected features across the five datasets spanning regionally diverse populations and three commonly collected biosamples (blood, buccal and saliva).
conclusionsBatch-effects are ever present, even in high-quality data, and a strategy to deal with them should be part of experimental design, particularly for EWAS. Batch-effect removal tools are useful to reduce technical variance in Infinium Methylation data, but they need to be applied with care and make use of post hoc diagnostic measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.