Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488307›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2022

Predictors of adherence to prescribed exercise programs for older adults with medical or surgical indications for exercise: a systematic review.

Julia F Shaw, Sophie Pilon, Matthieu Vierula, Daniel I McIsaac

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Exercise Habits in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Similar exercise adherence and physical fitness outcomes are observed across distinct motivation profiles in older adults participating in a home-based structured exercise programme.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reporting randomised trials of physical exercise or training interventions in older adults: the PETIO guideline.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia F ShawOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Sophie PilonDepartments of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Matthieu VierulaDepartments of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Daniel I McIsaacOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. dmcisaac@toh.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-1859
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPrescribed exercise to treat medical conditions and to prepare for surgery is a promising intervention to prevent adverse health outcomes for older adults; however, adherence to exercise programs may be low. Our objective was to identify and grade the quality of predictors of adherence to prescribed exercise in older adults.

methodsProspective observational and experimental studies were identified using a peer-reviewed search strategy applied to MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL from inception until October 6, 2020. Following an independent and duplicate review of titles, abstracts, and full texts, we included prospective studies with an average population age >65 years, where exercise was formally prescribed for a medical or surgical condition. We excluded studies where exercise was prescribed for a chronic musculoskeletal condition. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic studies tool or Cochrane risk of bias tool, as appropriate. Predictors of adherence were identified and graded for quality using an adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for predictor studies.

resultsWe included 19 observational studies and 4 randomized controlled trials (n=5785) Indications for exercise included cardiac (n=6), pulmonary rehabilitation (n=7), or other (n=10; surgical, medical, and neurologic). Of the 10 studies that reported adherence as the percent of prescribed sessions completed, average adherence was 80% (range 60-98%; standard deviation (SD) 11%). Of the 10 studies that reported adherence as a categorical threshold demarking adherent vs not adherent, average adherence was 57.5% (range 21-83%; SD 21%). Moderate-quality evidence suggested that positive predictors of adherence were self-efficacy and good self-rated mental health; negative predictors were depression (high quality) and distance from the exercise facility. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that comorbidity and age were not predictive of adherence.

conclusionsThese findings can inform the design of future exercise programs as well as the identification of individuals who may require extra support to benefit from prescribed exercise. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018108242.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyAgedChronic DiseaseHumansObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesSelf EfficacyEvidence-based medicineExercisePrognosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35488307
PMCPMC9052492
OpenAlexW4225127473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.