ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2022
Combining cytogenetic and genomic technologies for deciphering challenging complex chromosomal rearrangements.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement Involving Chromosomes 10, 18, and 19 in a Family Undergoing Prenatal Diagnosis: Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Uncovering Rare Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements: Insights from Molecular Cytogenetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Analysis of complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosome 6 via the integration of optical genomic mapping and molecular cytogenetic methodologies.Journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Long-read genome sequencing identifies cryptic structural variants in congenital aniridia cases.Human genomics · 2023Article
- Insight into the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome: Case report of a young women with infertility.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Complex genomic rearrangements: an underestimated cause of rare diseases.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
- Identification of a familial complex chromosomal rearrangement by optical genome mapping.Molecular cytogenetics · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of structural chromosomal rearrangement formation.Molecular cytogenetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs), a class of structural variants (SVs) involving more than two chromosome breaks, were classically thought to be extremely rare. As advanced technologies become more available, it has become apparent that CCRs are more common than formerly thought, and are a substantial cause of genetic disorders. We attempted a novel approach for solving the mechanism of challenging CCRs, which involve repetitive sequences, by precisely identifying sequence-level changes and their order. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) and FISH analyses were used for interpretation of SVs detected by whole exome sequencing (WES). Breakpoint junctions were analyzed by Nanopore sequencing, a novel long-read whole genome sequencing tool. A large deletion identified by WES, encompassing the FOXF1 enhancer, was the cause of alveolar capillary dysplasia and respiratory insufficiency, resulting in perinatal death. CMA analysis of the newborn's mother revealed two duplications encompassing the deleted region in the proband, raising our hypothesis that the deletion resulted from the mother's CCR. Breakpoint junctions of complex SVs were determined at the nucleotide level using Nanopore long-read sequencing. According to sequencing results of breakpoint junctions, the CCR in the newborn was considered the consequence of at least one double-strand break during meiosis, and reassembly of DNA fragments by intra-chromosomal homologous recombination. Our comprehensive approach, combining cytogenetics and long-read sequencing, enabled delineation of the exact breakpoints in a challenging CCR, and proposal of a mechanism in which it arises. We suggest applying our integrative approach combining technologies for deciphering future challenging CCRs, enabling risk assessment in families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.