Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35488003›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2022

Does Food Affect the Pharmacokinetics of Non-orally Delivered Drugs? A Review of Currently Available Evidence.

Peng Zou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peng ZouQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., 211 Mt. Airy Road, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 07920, USA. pzou@dsi.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The food effects for orally administered drugs have been widely investigated and reviewed. In contrast, our knowledge of food effects for non-orally administered drugs is scarce. In this review paper, we did a literature survey to collect clinical food effect data for non-orally administered drugs. Our survey retrieved 18 drugs, including thirteen intravenously (IV), two subcutaneously (SC), one intradermally (ID), one pulmonary, and one rectally administered drug. The food effect data show that food intake can increase the absorption of SC and ID administered peptides and proteins with MW < 30 kDa by 30-50%. On the other hand, food intake can increase the elimination of IV and inhaled drugs with moderate and high hepatic extraction and reduce drug exposure by up to 35%. The food effect knowledge can be used to mitigate potential efficacy and safety risks of non-orally administered drugs.

Indexed as

Foodfood effectsinhalationintradermalintravenoussubcutaneous

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.