Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487978›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol.

Ernest Z Low, Timothy S Nugent, Niall J O'Sullivan, Dara Kavanagh, John O Larkin, Paul H McCormick, Brian J Mehigan, Michael E Kelly

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ernest Z LowDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. lowe@tcd.ie.
Timothy S NugentDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Niall J O'SullivanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Dara KavanaghDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
John O LarkinDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Paul H McCormickDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Brian J MehiganDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael E KellyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
St. James's Hospital · IETrinity College Dublin · IETallaght University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThere is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy.

methodsThe PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction.

conclusionThe PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapySurgical WoundColostomyEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansIleostomyMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound InfectionColorectal surgeryColostomyIleostomyNegative pressure dressingsPREVENA therapyReversal surgerySurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID35487978
PMCPMC9072509
OpenAlexW4225145978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.