Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487969›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A lyophilized colorimetric RT-LAMP test kit for rapid, low-cost, at-home molecular testing of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens.

Xin Song, Felicity J Coulter, Ming Yang, Jessica L Smith, Fikadu G Tafesse, William B Messer, John H Reif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Rapid and Cost-EffectiveDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enhanced Specificity in Colorimetric LAMP Assay forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xin SongDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. xin.song@duke.edu.
Felicity J Coulter *Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Ming Yang *Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Jessica L SmithVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Beaverton, OR, 97006, USA.
Fikadu G TafesseDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
William B MesserDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. messer@ohsu.edu.
John H ReifDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. reif@cs.duke.edu.
Duke University · USOregon Health & Science University · USChildren's Cancer Therapy Development Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to fast and reliable nucleic acid testing continues to play a key role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in the context of increased vaccine break-through risks due to new variants. We report a rapid, low-cost (~ 2 USD), simple-to-use nucleic acid test kit for self-administered at-home testing without lab instrumentation. The entire sample-to-answer workflow takes < 60 min, including noninvasive sample collection, one-step RNA preparation, reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) in a thermos, and direct visual inspection of a colorimetric test result. To facilitate long-term storage without cold-chain, a fast one-pot lyophilization protocol was developed to preserve all required biochemical reagents of the colorimetric RT-LAMP test in a single microtube. Notably, the lyophilized RT-LAMP assay demonstrated reduced false positives as well as enhanced tolerance to a wider range of incubation temperatures compared to solution-based RT-LAMP reactions. We validated our RT-LAMP assay using simulated infected samples, and detected a panel of SARS-CoV-2 variants with successful detection of all variants that were available to us at the time. With a simple change of the primer set, our lyophilized RT-LAMP home test can be easily adapted as a low-cost surveillance platform for other pathogens and infectious diseases of global public health importance.

Indexed as

COVID-19Nucleic AcidsColorimetryHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID35487969
PMCPMC9052177
OpenAlexW4225127990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.