Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487936›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The regulatory role of γ-aminobutyric acid in chickpea plants depends on drought tolerance and water scarcity level.

Maryam Seifikalhor, Vahid Niknam, Sasan Aliniaeifard, Fardad Didaran, Georgios Tsaniklidis, Dimitrios Fanourakis, Mahsa Teymoorzadeh, Seyed Hasan Mousavi, Massimo Bosacchi, Tao Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigation of Drought Stress on Chickpea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maryam SeifikalhorDepartment of Plant Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, PO Box: 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran. Maryam.kalhor@gmail.com.
Vahid NiknamDepartment of Plant Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, PO Box: 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran. vniknam@khayam.ut.ac.ir.
Sasan AliniaeifardDepartment of Horticulture, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Fardad DidaranDepartment of Horticulture, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Georgios TsaniklidisInstitute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Plants and Viticulture, Hellenic Agricultural Organization 'ELGO-Dimitra', Kastorias 32A, 71307, Heraklion, Greece.
Dimitrios FanourakisLaboratory of Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products, Landscape and Environment, Department of Agriculture, School of Agricultural Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Estavromenos, 71004, Heraklion, Greece.
Mahsa TeymoorzadehInstitue of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Hasan MousaviVegetable Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Massimo BosacchiPark at the Danforth Plant Science Center, KWS Gateway Research Center, LLC, BRDG, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Tao LiInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, China.
University of Tehran · IRAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IRDonald Danforth Plant Science Center · USHellenic Mediterranean University · GRInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a non-protein amino acid with multifunctional roles in dynamic plant responses. To determine the effects of exogenous GABA application (0, 25 and 50 µM) on drought response, two chickpea cultivars with contrasting tolerance to water deficit were examined. Plants were exposed to four irrigation levels (irrigation to 100, 60, 40 and 20% field capacity). Water deficit decreased growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic efficiency. It increased electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation owing to both higher ROS accumulation and lower antioxidant enzyme activity. These negative effects of water deficit and the alleviating role of GABA application were more prominent in the sensitive, as compared to the tolerant cultivar. Water deficit also increased proline and GABA contents more in the tolerant cultivar, whereas their content was more enhanced by GABA application in the sensitive one. This may confer an additional level of regulation that results in better alleviation of drought damage in tolerant chickpea cultivars. In conclusion, the stimulatory effect of GABA on growth and physiological modulation depends on both the water stress severity and the cultivar sensitivity to it, implying a probable unknown GABA-related mechanism established by tolerant chickpea cultivars; a lost or not gained mechanism in susceptible ones.

Indexed as

CicerAntioxidantsChlorophyllDroughtsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidWater InsecurityAntioxidantsChlorophyllgamma-Aminobutyric Acid

Identifiers

PMID35487936
PMCPMC9054827
OpenAlexW4225159700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.