Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487742›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Rwanda's community health workers at the front line: a mixed-method study on perceived needs and challenges for community-based healthcare delivery during COVID-19 pandemic.

Anne Niyigena, Ignace Girukubonye, Dale A Barnhart, Vincent K Cubaka, Pierre Celestin Niyigena, Marcel Nshunguyabahizi, Beatrice Mukamana, Fredrick Kateera, Florence A Bitalabeho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne NiyigenaPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda niyianne@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-8083
Ignace GirukubonyePartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Dale A BarnhartPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0003-0129-0313
Vincent K CubakaPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Pierre Celestin NiyigenaPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Marcel NshunguyabahiziPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Beatrice MukamanaRwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Fredrick KateeraPartners In Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Florence A BitalabehoUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, community health workers (CHWs) served as front-line workers in the COVID-19 response while maintaining community health services. We aimed to understand challenges faced by Rwanda's CHWs during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown that occurred between March and May 2020 by assessing the availability of trainings, supplies and supervision while exploring perceived needs and challenges. DESIGN AND

settingThis study was a mixed-method study conducted in three Rwandan districts: Burera, Kirehe and Kayonza. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Using data collected via telephone, we assessed the availability of trainings, supplies and supervision during the first national lockdown, while exploring perceived needs and challenges of CHWs who were engaged in COVID-19 response, in addition to their existing duties of delivering health services in the community.

resultsAmong the 292 quantitative survey participants, CHWs were responsible for a median of 55 households (IQR: 42-79) and visited a median of 30 households (IQR: 11-52) in the month prior to the survey (July 2020). In the previous 12 months, only 164 (56.2%) CHWs reported being trained on any health topic. Gaps in supply availability, particularly for commodities, existed at the start of the lockdown and worsened over the course of the lockdown. Supervision during the lockdown was low, with nearly 10% of CHWs never receiving supervision and only 24% receiving at least three supervision visits during the 3-month lockdown. In qualitative interviews, CHWs additionally described increases in workload, lack of personal protective equipment and COVID-specific training, fear of COVID-19, and difficult working conditions.

conclusionMany challenges faced by CHWs during the lockdown predated COVID-19 and persisted or were exacerbated during the pandemic. To promote the resilience of Rwanda's CHW system, we recommend increased access to PPE; investment in training, supervision and supply chain management; and financial compensation for CHWs.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchRwandachange managementCOVID-19epidemiologyprimary carepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35487742
PMCPMC9058292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.