Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487708›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Using routine healthcare data to evaluate the impact of the Medicines at Transitions Intervention (MaTI) on clinical outcomes of patients hospitalised with heart failure: protocol for the Improving the Safety and Continuity Of Medicines management at Transitions of care (ISCOMAT) cluster randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation, health economics evaluation and internal pilot.

Lauren A Moreau, Ivana Holloway, Beth Fylan, Suzanne Hartley, Bonnie Cundill, Alison Fergusson, Sarah Alderson, David Phillip Alldred, Chris Bojke, Liz Breen and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren A MoreauLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK l.a.moreau@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0280-6345
Ivana HollowayLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Beth FylanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0599-4537
Suzanne HartleyLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bonnie CundillLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alison FergussonLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sarah AldersonAcademic Unit of Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-0495
David Phillip AlldredNIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2525-4854
Chris BojkeAcademic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Liz BreenSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-1187
Hanif IsmailSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Peter GardnerSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8799-0443
Ellen MasonLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Catherine PowellSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7590-0247
Jonathan SilcockSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-9249
Andrew TaylorISCOMAT Patient Led Steering Group, Manchester, UK.
Amanda FarrinLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Chris GaleUniversity of Leeds Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Leeds, UK.
ISCOMAT Programme Management Team
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Bradford · GBOfcom · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeart failure affects 26 million people globally, approximately 900 thousand people in the UK, and is increasing in incidence. Appropriate management of medicines for heart failure at the time of hospital discharge reduces readmissions, improves quality of life and increases survival. The Improving the Safety and Continuity Of Medicines management at Transitions (ISCOMAT) trial tests the effectiveness of the Medicines at Transition Intervention (MaTI), which aims to enhance self-care and increase community pharmacy involvement in the medicines management of heart failure patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ISCOMAT is a parallel-group cluster randomised controlled trial, randomising 42 National Health Service trusts with cardiology wards in England on a 1:1 basis to implement the MaTI or treatment as usual. Around 2100 patients over the age of 18 admitted to hospital with heart failure with at least moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction within the last 5 years, and planned discharge to the geographical area of the cluster will be recruited. The MaTI consists of training for staff, a toolkit for participants, transfer of discharge information to community pharmacies and a medicines reconciliation/review. Treatment as usual is determined by local policy and practices. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalisation at 12 months postregistration obtained from national electronic health records. The key secondary outcome is continued prescription of guideline-indicated therapies at 12 months measured via patient-reported data and Hospital Episode Statistics. The trial contains a parallel mixed-methods process evaluation and an embedded health economics study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study obtained approval from the Yorkshire and the Humber-Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee; REC reference 18/YH/0017. Findings will be disseminated via academic and policy conferences, peer-reviewed publications and social media. Amendments to the protocol are disseminated to all relevant parties as required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN66212970; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Heart FailureQuality of LifeAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState MedicineCardiologyClinical trialsHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID35487708
PMCPMC9058770
OpenAlexW4225245867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.