Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487692›Full record

ArticleLife science alliance2022

Reduced adhesion of aged intestinal stem cells contributes to an accelerated clonal drift.

Ali Hageb, Torsten Thalheim, Kalpana J Nattamai, Bettina Möhrle, Mehmet Saçma, Vadim Sakk, Lars Thielecke, Kerstin Cornils, Carolin Grandy, Fabian Port and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life science alliance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intestinal Stem Cells: Regulation, Plasticity, and Therapeutic Potential.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hallmarks of stem cell aging.Cell stem cell · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali HagebInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Torsten ThalheimInterdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Kalpana J NattamaiDivision of Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2210-9950
Bettina MöhrleInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Mehmet SaçmaInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-674X
Vadim SakkInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5797-5851
Lars ThieleckeInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Kerstin CornilsClinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Division of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Carolin GrandyInstitute for Experimental Physics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2342-9702
Fabian PortInstitute for Experimental Physics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2417-4278
Kay-E GottschalkInstitute for Experimental Physics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Jan-Philipp MallmDivision of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7059-4030
Ingmar GlaucheInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2524-1199
Jörg GalleInterdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Medhanie A MulawCentral Unit Single Cell Sequencing, Medical Faculty, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany hartmut.geiger@uni-ulm.de Medhanie.Mulaw@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2501-6952
Hartmut GeigerInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany hartmut.geiger@uni-ulm.de Medhanie.Mulaw@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5794-5430
Universität Ulm · DELeipzig University · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DECincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon aging, the function of the intestinal epithelium declines with a concomitant increase in aging-related diseases. ISCs play an important role in this process. It is known that ISC clonal dynamics follow a neutral drift model. However, it is not clear whether the drift model is still valid in aged ISCs. Tracking of clonal dynamics by clonal tracing revealed that aged crypts drift into monoclonality substantially faster than young ones. However, ISC tracing experiments, in vivo and ex vivo, implied a similar clonal expansion ability of both young and aged ISCs. Single-cell RNA sequencing for 1,920 high Lgr5 ISCs from young and aged mice revealed increased heterogeneity among subgroups of aged ISCs. Genes associated with cell adhesion were down-regulated in aged ISCs. ISCs of aged mice indeed show weaker adhesion to the matrix. Simulations applying a single cell-based model of the small intestinal crypt demonstrated an accelerated clonal drift at reduced adhesion strength, implying a central role for reduced adhesion for affecting clonal dynamics upon aging.

Indexed as

IntestinesStem CellsAnimalsCells, CulturedIleumIntestinal MucosaMice

Identifiers

PMID35487692
PMCPMC9057243
OpenAlexW4225247885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.