ReviewGlobal health, science and practice2022
The Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships.
Review in Global health, science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing global health equity through Global Collaborative Evidence Networks: a narrative literature review of governance models, power and participation.Globalization and health · 2026Review
- From co-creation to practice: a collaborative program strengthening palliative care capacity in primary health care in Ghana.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A scoping review of equity toolkits for international academic partnerships.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- How to (or how not to)…Enhance equity in the conduct of global health research: dimensions and directions for organizations.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Establishing best practices guidelines for collaborative research in global surgery: developing a Delphi survey.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Using a Partnership-Based Approach to Strengthen Acute Care Systems in the Pacific and Timor-Leste.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025Article
- Transforming partnerships through transboundary research.BMJ global health · 2025Review
- How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Promoting More Equitable Global Health Research, Education, and Community Partnerships: The Efforts of One US‑Based Academic Institution.Annals of global health · 2025Article
- National capacity strengthening within the context of an international vector control partnership: findings from a qualitative study conducted within the Ugandan 'Tiny Targets' programme.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Global emergency medicine partnerships and practice: best practices on forming partnerships.CJEM · 2024Article
- Reflective questioning to guide socially just global health reform: a narrative review and expert elicitation.International journal for equity in health · 2024Review
- A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Identifying the conundrums of "global health" in the Global North and Global South: a case for Sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Exploring HIV/AIDS investigator perceptions of equity within research partnerships between low-and middle-income and high-income countries: a pilot survey.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- How to do (or not to do)…how to embed equity in the conduct of health research: lessons from piloting the 8Quity tool.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- With equity in mind: Evaluating an interactive hybrid global surgery course for cross-site interdisciplinary learners.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- Prioritizing gender equity and intersectionality in Canadian global health institutions and partnerships.PLOS global public health · 2022Review
- Expert perspectives on priorities for supporting health security in the Pacific region through health systems strengthening.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global health partnerships (GHPs) involve complex relationships between individuals and organizations, often joining partners from high-income and low- or middle-income countries around work that is carried out in the latter. Therefore, GHPs are situated in the context of global inequities and their underlying sociopolitical and historical causes, such as colonization. Equity is a core principle that should guide GHPs from start to end. How equity is embedded and nurtured throughout a partnership has remained a constant challenge. We have developed a user-friendly tool for valuing a GHP throughout its lifespan using an equity lens. The development of the EQT was informed by 5 distinct elements: a scoping review of scientific published peer-reviewed literature; an online survey and follow-up telephone interviews; workshops in Canada, Burkina Faso, and Vietnam; a critical interpretive synthesis; and a content validation exercise. Findings suggest GHPs generate experiences of equity or inequity yet provide little guidance on how to identify and respond to these experiences. The EQT can guide people involved in partnering to consider the equity implications of all their actions, from inception, through implementation and completion of a partnership. When used to guide reflective dialogue with a clear intention to advance equity in and through partnering, this tool offers a new approach to valuing global health partnerships. Global health practitioners, among others, can apply the EQT in their partnerships to learning together about how to cultivate equity in their unique contexts within what is becoming an increasingly diverse, vibrant, and responsive global health community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.