Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487348›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2022

A Validation Framework for Somatic Copy Number Detection in Targeted Sequencing Panels.

Raghu Chandramohan, Jacquelyn Reuther, Ilavarasi Gandhi, Horatiu Voicu, Karla R Alvarez, Sharon E Plon, Dolores H Lopez-Terrada, Kevin E Fisher, D Williams Parsons, Angshumoy Roy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The oncogenome of the domestic cat.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raghu ChandramohanDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Jacquelyn ReutherDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Ilavarasi GandhiDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Horatiu VoicuDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Karla R AlvarezDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Sharon E PlonDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; The Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; The Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Dolores H Lopez-TerradaDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; The Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Kevin E FisherDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; The Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
D Williams ParsonsDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; The Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; The Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: dwparson@texaschildrens.org.
Angshumoy RoyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; The Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: aroy@bcm.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Measuring Perceptions of Utility of Clinical Genome Sequencing: Instrument Testing and ValidationU01HG006485 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MCGUIRE, AMY L, PARSONS, DONALD W. · 2012 to 2021
$22.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) in tumors are clinically significant diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. SCNA detection from targeted next-generation sequencing panels is increasingly common in clinical practice; however, detailed descriptions of optimization and validation of SCNA pipelines for small targeted panels are limited. This study describes the validation and implementation of a tumor-only SCNA pipeline using CNVkit, augmented with custom modules and optimized for clinical implementation by testing reference materials and clinical tumor samples with different classes of copy number variation (CNV; amplification, single copy loss, and biallelic loss). Using wet-bench and in silico methods, various parameters impacting CNV calling, including assay-intrinsic variables (establishment of normal reference and sequencing coverage), sample-intrinsic variables (tumor purity and sample quality), and CNV algorithm-intrinsic variables (bin size), were optimized. The pipeline was trained and tested on an optimization cohort and validated using an independent cohort with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 93%, respectively. Using custom modules, intragenic CNVs with breakpoints within tumor suppressor genes were uncovered. Using the validated pipeline, re-analysis of 28 pediatric solid tumors that had been previously profiled for mutations identified SCNAs in 86% (24/28) samples, with 46% (13/28) samples harboring findings of potential clinical relevance. Our report highlights the importance of rigorous establishment of performance characteristics of SCNA pipelines and presents a detailed validation framework for optimal SCNA detection in targeted sequencing panels.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsNeoplasmsAlgorithmsChildHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID35487348
PMCPMC9302205
OpenAlexW4224951224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.