Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35487155›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2022

Bayesian sequential data assimilation for COVID-19 forecasting.

Maria L Daza-Torres, Marcos A Capistrán, Antonio Capella, J Andrés Christen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria L Daza-TorresCentro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT, Guanajuato, Mexico; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, CA, United States. Electronic address: mdazatorres@cimat.mx.
Marcos A CapistránCentro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Antonio CapellaCentro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT, Guanajuato, Mexico; Instituto de Matemáticas, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, CU, CDMX, Mexico.
J Andrés ChristenCentro de Investigación en Matemáticas, CIMAT, Guanajuato, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a Bayesian sequential data assimilation and forecasting method for non-autonomous dynamical systems. We applied this method to the current COVID-19 pandemic. It is assumed that suitable transmission, epidemic and observation models are available and previously validated. The transmission and epidemic models are coded into a dynamical system. The observation model depends on the dynamical system state variables and parameters, and is cast as a likelihood function. The forecast is sequentially updated over a sliding window of epidemic records as new data becomes available. Prior distributions for the state variables at the new forecasting time are assembled using the dynamical system, calibrated for the previous forecast. Epidemic outbreaks are non-autonomous dynamical systems depending on human behavior, viral evolution and climate, among other factors, rendering it impossible to make reliable long-term epidemic forecasts. We show our forecasting method's performance using a SEIR type model and COVID-19 data from several Mexican localities. Moreover, we derive further insights into the COVID-19 pandemic from our model predictions. The rationale of our approach is that sequential data assimilation is an adequate compromise between data fitting and dynamical system prediction.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremDisease OutbreaksForecastingHumansPandemicsBayesian inferenceCOVID-19Data assimilationSEIRD

Identifiers

PMID35487155
PMCPMC9023479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.