Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486893›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

The Architecture of a Feasibility Query Portal for Distributed COVID-19 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Patient Data Repositories: Design and Implementation Study.

Julian Gruendner, Noemi Deppenwiese, Michael Folz, Thomas Köhler, Björn Kroll, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Lorenz Rosenau, Mathias Rühle, Marc-Anton Scheidl, Christina Schüttler and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Research Informatics: Contributions from 2022.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards cross-application model-agnostic federated cohort discovery.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [FAIR health data in the national and international data space].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Ten Topics to Get Started in Medical Informatics Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Julian GruendnerChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7204-5329
Noemi DeppenwieseCenter of Medical Information and Communication Technology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-1209
Michael FolzInstitute of Medical Informatics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0105-5412
Thomas KöhlerFederated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8993-0794
Björn KrollIT Center for Clinical Research, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-8993
Hans-Ulrich ProkoschChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-753X
Lorenz RosenauIT Center for Clinical Research, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-2792
Mathias RühleLeipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-889X
Marc-Anton ScheidlChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9264-0210
Christina SchüttlerChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9008-1868
Brita SedlmayrInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-7822
Alexander TwrdikLeipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-0186
Alexander Kiel *Federated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-8185
Raphael W Majeed *Institute for Medical Informatics, University Clinic Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-8815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn essential step in any medical research project after identifying the research question is to determine if there are sufficient patients available for a study and where to find them. Pursuing digital feasibility queries on available patient data registries has proven to be an excellent way of reusing existing real-world data sources. To support multicentric research, these feasibility queries should be designed and implemented to run across multiple sites and securely access local data. Working across hospitals usually involves working with different data formats and vocabularies. Recently, the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard was developed by Health Level Seven to address this concern and describe patient data in a standardized format. The Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany has committed to this standard and created data integration centers, which convert existing data into the FHIR format at each hospital. This partially solves the interoperability problem; however, a distributed feasibility query platform for the FHIR standard is still missing.

objectiveThis study described the design and implementation of the components involved in creating a cross-hospital feasibility query platform for researchers based on FHIR resources. This effort was part of a large COVID-19 data exchange platform and was designed to be scalable for a broad range of patient data.

methodsWe analyzed and designed the abstract components necessary for a distributed feasibility query. This included a user interface for creating the query, backend with an ontology and terminology service, middleware for query distribution, and FHIR feasibility query execution service.

resultsWe implemented the components described in the Methods section. The resulting solution was distributed to 33 German university hospitals. The functionality of the comprehensive network infrastructure was demonstrated using a test data set based on the German Corona Consensus Data Set. A performance test using specifically created synthetic data revealed the applicability of our solution to data sets containing millions of FHIR resources. The solution can be easily deployed across hospitals and supports feasibility queries, combining multiple inclusion and exclusion criteria using standard Health Level Seven query languages such as Clinical Quality Language and FHIR Search. Developing a platform based on multiple microservices allowed us to create an extendable platform and support multiple Health Level Seven query languages and middleware components to allow integration with future directions of the Medical Informatics Initiative.

conclusionsWe designed and implemented a feasibility platform for distributed feasibility queries, which works directly on FHIR-formatted data and distributed it across 33 university hospitals in Germany. We showed that developing a feasibility platform directly on the FHIR standard is feasible.

Indexed as

consensus data setCOVID-19CQLdistributed analysisFast Healthcare Interoperability Resourcesfeasibility studyfederated feasibility queriesFHIRFHIR Searchhealth dataHL7 FHIRmedical informaticspandemicpatient dataquery

Identifiers

PMID35486893
PMCPMC9135115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.