Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486695›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

The non-Riemannian nature of perceptual color space.

Roxana Bujack, Emily Teti, Jonah Miller, Elektra Caffrey, Terece L Turton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The origin of color categories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Proximity matters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roxana BujackComputer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-3726
Emily TetiComputer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.
Jonah MillerComputer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.
Elektra CaffreyComputer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.
Terece L TurtonComputer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.ORCID 0000-0003-4345-7783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific community generally agrees on the theory, introduced by Riemann and furthered by Helmholtz and Schrödinger, that perceived color space is not Euclidean but rather, a three-dimensional Riemannian space. We show that the principle of diminishing returns applies to human color perception. This means that large color differences cannot be derived by adding a series of small steps, and therefore, perceptual color space cannot be described by a Riemannian geometry. This finding is inconsistent with the current approaches to modeling perceptual color space. Therefore, the assumed shape of color space requires a paradigm shift. Consequences of this apply to color metrics that are currently used in image and video processing, color mapping, and the paint and textile industries. These metrics are valid only for small differences. Rethinking them outside of a Riemannian setting could provide a path to extending them to large differences. This finding further hints at the existence of a second-order Weber–Fechner law describing perceived differences.

Indexed as

Color Perceptioncognitioncolor spacediminishing returnsmetricRiemann

Identifiers

PMID35486695
PMCPMC9170152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.