Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486663›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Impact of visual impairment on balance and visual processing functions in students with special educational needs.

Kai Yip Choi, Ho Yin Wong, Hoi Nga Cheung, Jung Kai Tseng, Ching Chung Chen, Chieh Lin Wu, Helen Eng, George C Woo, Allen Ming Yan Cheong

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Convergent Validity Between Two Adult Self-Report Sensory Processing Scales.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai Yip ChoiSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-0443-3028
Ho Yin WongSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Hoi Nga CheungSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Jung Kai TsengDepartment of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ching Chung ChenDepartment of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chieh Lin WuDepartment of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Helen EngSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
George C WooSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-1280
Allen Ming Yan CheongSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-6746-3902
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKAsia University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVision is critical for children's development. However, prevalence of visual impairment (VI) is high in students with special educational needs (SEN). Other than VI, SEN students are prone to having functional deficits. Whether visual problems relate to these functional deficits is unclear. This study aimed to assess the impact of vision on visual processing functions and balance in SEN students through a community service.

methodsVisual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity were measured in a total of 104 (aged 14.3±4.3) SEN students as the visual outcomes, followed by retinoscopy. Visual processing function assessment included facial expression recognition by card matching examiner's facial expression matching, and visual orientation recognition. Dynamic balance, by Timed Up and Go test, and static standing balance (postural sway in double-legged standing with feet-together and tandem-stance for open-eye and closed-eye conditions) were assessed. Static balance was presented in terms of the maximal medial-lateral and antero-posterior sways.

resultsOf the 104 students, 62 (59.6%) were classified as visually impaired according to WHO classification of visual impairment based on presenting distance acuity. Ocular problems (e.g. optic nerve anomaly, uncorrected/ under-corrected refractive errors) and neurological anomalies were the major causes of vision loss. VA was positively associated with visual processing functions (all p ≤ 0.01), as SEN students with better vision tended to perform better in visual orientation and facial expression recognition tasks, as well as dynamic balance function (p = 0.04). For the static balance, postural sway and VA showed a positive relationship under open-eye and tandem stance conditions. However, the relationship between postural sway and VA became negative under closed-eye and tandem stance conditions.

conclusionThis study found a high prevalence of SEN students with visual impairment, in which many of them were undetected. Optometric examination is important to improve their visual function to minimize the effect of vision on functional performance. Vision is critical in visual processing as well as playing an important role in maintaining balance in SEN students.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceVision, LowChildHumansStudentsTime and Motion StudiesVision DisordersVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID35486663
PMCPMC9053808
OpenAlexW4225894895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.