Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Analytical and clinical validation of an amplicon-based next generation sequencing assay for ultrasensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA.

Jonathan Poh, Kao Chin Ngeow, Michelle Pek, Kian-Hin Tan, Jing Shan Lim, Hao Chen, Choon Kiat Ong, Jing Quan Lim, Soon Thye Lim, Chwee Ming Lim and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Feasibility ofCancers · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Longitudinal Tracking ofJTO clinical and research reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan PohLucence Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-8667
Kao Chin NgeowLucence Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Michelle PekLucence Health Inc, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Kian-Hin TanLucence Health Inc, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Jing Shan LimLucence Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Hao ChenLucence Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Choon Kiat OngNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jing Quan LimNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Soon Thye LimNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Chwee Ming LimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Boon Cher GohNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yukti ChoudhuryLucence Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0038-0520
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational University Hospital · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA presents a promising approach to cancer diagnostics, complementing conventional tissue-based diagnostic testing by enabling minimally invasive serial testing and broad genomic coverage through a simple blood draw to maximize therapeutic benefit to patients. LiquidHALLMARK® is an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing assay developed for the genomic profiling of plasma-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA). The comprehensive 80-gene panel profiles point mutations, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, and gene fusions, and further detects oncogenic viruses (Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV)) and microsatellite instability (MSI). Here, the analytical and clinical validation of the assay is reported. Analytical validation using reference genetic materials demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.38% for point mutations and 95.83% for insertions/deletions at 0.1% variant allele frequency (VAF), and a sensitivity of 91.67% for gene fusions at 0.5% VAF. In non-cancer samples, a high specificity (≥99.9999% per-base) was observed. The limit of detection for copy number alterations, EBV, HBV, and MSI were also empirically determined. Orthogonal comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variant calls made by LiquidHALLMARK and a reference allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) method for 355 lung cancer specimens revealed an overall concordance of 93.80%, while external validation with cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 for 50 lung cancer specimens demonstrated an overall concordance of 84.00%, with a 100% concordance rate for EGFR variants above 0.4% VAF. Clinical application of LiquidHALLMARK in 1,592 consecutive patients demonstrated a high detection rate (74.8% circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-positive in cancer samples) and broad actionability (50.0% of cancer samples harboring alterations with biological evidence for actionability). Among ctDNA-positive lung cancers, 72.5% harbored at least one biomarker with a guideline-approved drug indication. These results establish the high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision of the LiquidHALLMARK assay and supports its clinical application for blood-based genomic testing.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsLung NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansCirculating Tumor DNAErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID35486650
PMCPMC9053827
OpenAlexW4225784185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.