Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Awareness, perception and perpetration of cyberbullying by high school students and undergraduates in Thailand.

Salinee Thumronglaohapun, Benchalak Maneeton, Narong Maneeton, Sasikarn Limpiti, Natthaporn Manojai, Jeerayut Chaijaruwanich, Unyamanee Kummaraka, Ruethaichanok Kardkasem, Tanarat Muangmool, Suttipong Kawilapat and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reliability and Validity of the Vietnamese Cyberbullying Scale (CBS) Among University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University Students.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Salinee ThumronglaohapunDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Benchalak ManeetonDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Narong ManeetonDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sasikarn LimpitiFaculty of Mass Communication, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Natthaporn ManojaiMplus Foundation, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Jeerayut ChaijaruwanichDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Data Science Research Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Unyamanee KummarakaDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Ruethaichanok KardkasemDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tanarat MuangmoolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Suttipong KawilapatDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kanokkarn JuntapingDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Patrinee TraisathitDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pimwarat SrikummoonDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-3131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern online society requires everyone, especially children and young people, to learn how to use the Internet. Cyberbullying is one misuse that can be detrimental to the cyberbullied individuals' mental health and lifestyle, and it often ends up with the victim becoming depressed, fearful of society, and in the worst cases, suicidal ideation. The aim of this study is to investigate the awareness, perception, and perpetration of cyberbullying by high school students and undergraduates to find ways to prevent cyberbullying in the future. For this cross-sectional study, data were collected in 2020 from 14 schools throughout Thailand and 4 universities in Chiang Mai, Thailand, using two-stage sampling. Chi-squared tests were used to compare differences between the groups. Of the 2,683 high school students, girls perceived cyberbullying more than boys (81.6% vs. 75.4%; p <0.001), with those from the later academic years being more aware of cyberbullying (p = 0.033) and more likely to conduct cyberbullying behavior (p = 0.027). Of the 721 undergraduates, women were more aware of cyberbullying than men (92.1% vs. 82.7%; p <0.001). The most common cause of cyberbullying was aiming to tease the target (67.6% of high school students vs. 82.5% of undergraduates). The most commonly cyberbullying victimization was sending mocking or rebuking messages (29.6% of high school students and 39.6% of undergraduates). The most popular solutions for cyberbullying were to avoid leaving a trace on social media and be with friends who accept who you are. Our findings show that most of the cyberbullying perpetrators did not consider that their actions would have serious consequences and only carried out cyberbullying because of wanting to tease their victims. This is useful information for the cyberbullying solution center, teachers, and parents to recognize how to make the students realize the effects of cyberbullying on the victims.

Indexed as

CyberbullyingAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePerceptionStudentsThailand

Identifiers

PMID35486631
PMCPMC9053786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.