Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486425›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

The Acceptability of an Electronically Delivered Acceptance- and Mindfulness-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Survivors of Breast Cancer: One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design.

Michael C Robertson, Emily Cox-Martin, Ross Shegog, Christine M Markham, Kayo Fujimoto, Casey P Durand, Abenaa Brewster, Elizabeth J Lyons, Yue Liao, Sara A Flores and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michael C RobertsonDepartment of Nutrition, Metabolism, and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2240-014X
Emily Cox-MartinVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Tacoma, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2693-9553
Ross ShegogHealth Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-0817
Christine M MarkhamHealth Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-894X
Kayo FujimotoHealth Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8445-2711
Casey P DurandHealth Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-276X
Abenaa BrewsterDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-3244
Elizabeth J LyonsDepartment of Nutrition, Metabolism, and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-2236
Yue LiaoCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, The University of Texas, Arlington, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-336X
Sara A FloresDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-3720
Karen M Basen-EngquistDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-0646
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTexas A&M University · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Developing and testing an electronically delivered acceptance- and mindfulness-based intervention to increase physical activity in breast cancer survivorsF31CA236433 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ROBERTSON, MICHAEL C. · 2019 to 2020
$61k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA236433NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvivors of breast cancer can face internal barriers to physical activity, such as uncertainty and frustration stemming from physical limitations, decreased physical functioning, fatigue, and pain. Interventions that draw from the principles of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may help survivors of breast cancer overcome some of the internal barriers associated with physical activity.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability of an electronically delivered physical activity intervention for survivors of breast cancer, centered on ACT processes.

methodsThis study used a 1-group pretest-posttest design. We recruited 80 insufficiently active female survivors of breast cancer using a web-based recruitment strategy. The 8-week intervention consisted of weekly modules that featured didactic lessons and experiential exercises targeting key ACT processes in the context of physical activity promotion (namely, values, committed action, acceptance, defusion, and contacting the present moment). We determined intervention acceptability according to study retention (≥70%), adherence rates (≥75% of the participants completing ≥50% of the modules), and posttest survey scores reflecting the perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and interest and enjoyment of the intervention (≥5 on a 7-point Likert-type scale). We also evaluated changes in self-reported aerobic and muscle strengthening-physical activity, physical activity acceptance, physical activity regulation, and health-related outcomes.

resultsThe retention rate (61/80, 76%), adherence rate (60/80, 75%), average perceived ease of use (6.17, SD 1.17), perceived usefulness (5.59, SD 1.40), and interest and enjoyment scores (5.43, SD 1.40) met the acceptability criteria. Participants increased their self-reported aerobic physical activity (Cohen d=1.04), muscle strengthening-physical activity (Cohen d=1.02), physical activity acceptance (cognitive acceptance: Cohen d=0.35; behavioral commitment: Cohen d=0.51), physical activity regulation (identified regulation: Cohen d=0.37; integrated regulation: Cohen d=0.66), increased their ability to participate in social roles and activities (Cohen d=0.18), and reported less fatigue (Cohen d=0.33) and sleep disturbance (Cohen d=0.53).

conclusionsElectronically delivered acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions may be useful for promoting physical activity in survivors of breast cancer. Further research is needed to refine these approaches and evaluate their effectiveness.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment Therapybehavioral sciencescancer survivorsexercisemindfulness

Identifiers

PMID35486425
PMCPMC9107061
OpenAlexW4225088741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.