Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486402›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of School Education With Eyesight Among Children and Adolescents.

Chunfeng Zhang, Ling Li, Catherine Jan, Xiang Li, Jia Qu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Myopia is predominantly genetic or predominantly environmental?Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chunfeng ZhangNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ling LiNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Catherine JanLost Child's Vision Project, Sydney, Australia.
Xiang LiNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jia QuSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Peking University · CNAffiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College · CNCentre for Eye Research Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Myopia in youths is an increasingly common global problem, associated with significant social and economic burden worldwide. Objectives: To explore the association of school education with myopia and investigate its scale, controlling confounding factors, such as age and socioeconomic status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2019 to December 2020 using regression discontinuity (RD) based on the Compulsory Education Law to examine the complex association of school education with myopia. Participants were youths from grades 1 to 12 before tertiary or university studies in China, including individuals from 815 primary schools, 373 junior high schools, and 145 senior high schools. Data were analyzed from February through June 2021. Exposures: Participants born earlier in a year (ie, January to August) were assigned 1 more year of education and were considered to be in the treated group, while participants born September to December were considered to be in the control group. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in mean spherical equivalent refractive error (MSE) and uncorrected visual acuity (UVA) between treated and control groups were calculated. Results: Among a mean (SD) of 812 979 (55 953) participants across 5 surveys survey (mean SD 44.9% [0.5%] female participants; mean [SD] age, 11.19 [2.60] years), the mean (SD) MSE was -1.30 (2.93) diopters and mean (SD) UVA was 4.77 (0.34) points. Every additional year at school was associated with an decrease in MSE of -0.17 diopters/y (95% CI, -0.22 to -0.11 diopters/y) and a decrease in UVA of -0.03 points/y (95% CI, -0.04 to -0.02 points/y), which accounts for nearly 66.4% (95% CI, 85.9% to 43.0%) and 78.9% (95% CI, 102.6% to 55.3%) of changes of MSE and UVA, respectively, among all factors for youths. The greatest MSE shifts occurred in grades 3 and 7 (eg, for the June 2019 census, the RD was -0.26 diopters/y [95% CI, -0.33 to -0.20 diopters/y] for grade 3 and -0.41 diopters/y [95% CI, -0.66 to -0.15 diopters/y] for grade 7). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that receiving more years of education, instead of age, may be a risk factor associated with myopia progression in youths.

Indexed as

MyopiaAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID35486402
PMCPMC9055461
OpenAlexW4225113026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.