ArticleStem cells translational medicine2022
Contamination Rate of Cryopreserved Umbilical Cord Blood Is Inversely Correlated with Volume of Sample Collected and Is also Dependent on Delivery Mode.
Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the Bio-Instructive Placental Extracellular Matrix: Structural Properties, Decellularization, and Applications in Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical feasibility of using perinatal medical waste as a source for fetal mesenchymal stem cell banking under good manufacturing practice conditions.Cell and tissue banking · 2025Observational
- [Progress in the clinical application of cord blood transfusion in neonates].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Review
- Article
- Regenerative Potential of Umbilical Cord Blood-derived Stromal Cells along with Phytosterol Campesterol in Wound Healing of a Rat Model.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Decontamination of Two Umbilical Cord Blood Grafts Prior to Autologous Administration.Maedica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cord blood (CB) collected at birth has become a valuable stem cell source for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the collection of umbilical cord blood always bears a risk of microbiological contamination, both in vaginal birth and in cesarean section. A total of 10 054 umbilical cord stem cell samples were successfully cryopreserved between 2010 and 2020, of which 783 (8%) samples were tested positive for bacterial contamination. Umbilical CB with a volume of less than 60 mL showed a bacterial contamination rate of 12%, and above 60 mL volume a rate of 6% was found demonstrating an inverse relationship between sample volume and contamination rate (correlation coefficient r = -0.9). The contamination rate was associated with the mode of delivery and showed a significantly higher contamination rate of 9.7% when compared with cesarean deliveries (1.4%). The 10-year period consistently shows an average contamination rate between 4% and 6% per year. It is conceivable that the inverse relationship between volume and contamination rate might be related to thinner veins although no scientific evidence has been provided so far. The lower contamination rate in cesarean sections appears to be related to the sterile operating setting. Overall, the rate of bacterial contamination varies and depends on the type of birth, the way of delivery, and probably the experience of the staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.