Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486345›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

Using DeepLab v3 + -based semantic segmentation to evaluate platelet activation.

Tsung-Chen Kuo, Ting-Wei Cheng, Ching-Kai Lin, Ming-Che Chang, Kuang-Yao Cheng, Yun-Chien Cheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tsung-Chen KuoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Ting-Wei ChengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Ching-Kai LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Ming-Che ChangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Kuang-Yao ChengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Yun-Chien ChengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan. yccheng@nctu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research used DeepLab v3 + -based semantic segmentation to automatically evaluate the platelet activation process and count the number of platelets from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Current activated platelet recognition and counting methods include (a) using optical microscopy or SEM images to identify and manually count platelets at different stages, or (b) using flow cytometry to automatically recognize and count platelets. However, the former is time- and labor-consuming, while the latter cannot be employed due to the complicated morphology of platelet transformation during activation. Additionally, because of how complicated the transformation of platelets is, current blood-cell image analysis methods, such as logistic regression or convolution neural networks, cannot precisely recognize transformed platelets. Therefore, this study used DeepLab v3 + , a powerful learning model for semantic segmentation of image analysis, to automatically recognize and count platelets at different activation stages from SEM images. Deformable convolution, a pretrained model, and deep supervision were added to obtain additional platelet transformation features and higher accuracy. The number of activated platelets was predicted by dividing the segmentation predicted platelet area by the average platelet area. The results showed that the model counted the activated platelets at different stages from the SEM images, achieving an error rate within 20%. The error rate was approximately 10% for stages 2 and 4. The proposed approach can thus save labor and time for evaluating platelet activation and facilitate related research.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSemanticsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlatelet ActivationActivation processAutomatic countingDeep learningPlateletSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.