Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486335›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2023

COVID-19 vaccine uptake and attitudes towards mandates in a nationally representative U.S. sample.

Julen N Harris, Christine Mauro, Jane A Andresen, Gregory D Zimet, Susan L Rosenthal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Could Belief in Fake News Predict Vaccination Behavior in the Elderly?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julen N HarrisDepartment of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th St, 17th Fl Room 102A, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Christine MauroDepartment of Biostatistics at the Mailman School of Public Health at, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jane A AndresenDepartment of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th St, 17th Fl Room 102A, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Gregory D ZimetDivision of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan L RosenthalDepartment of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th St, 17th Fl Room 102A, New York, NY, 10032, USA. slr2154@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USIndiana University School of MedicineNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread uptake of COVID-19 vaccination is vital to curtailing the pandemic, yet rates remain suboptimal in the U.S. Vaccine mandates have previously been successful, but are controversial. An April 2021 survey of a nationally representative sample (N = 1208) examined vaccine uptake, attitudes, and sociodemographic characteristics. Sixty-seven percent were vaccine acceptors, 14% wait-and-see, and 19% non-acceptors. Compared to wait-and-see and non-acceptors, acceptors were more likely to have a household member over age 65, have received a flu shot, have positive COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, and view COVID-19 vaccination as beneficial. Mandate support was higher among respondents who were vaccine acceptors, had positive views about COVID-19 vaccines, believed in COVID-19 preventive strategies, perceived COVID-19 as severe, were liberal, resided in the Northeast, were non-White, and had incomes < $75,000. Public health campaigns should target attitudes that appear to drive hesitancy and prepare for varying mandate support based on demographics, COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, and the scope of the mandate.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedHealth PromotionHumansIncomePandemicsVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19VaccinationVaccine attitudesVaccine hesitancyVaccine mandates

Identifiers

PMID35486335
PMCPMC9051757
OpenAlexW4225113282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.