Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486325›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Current State of Data and Analytics Research in Baseball.

Joshua Mizels, Brandon Erickson, Peter Chalmers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua MizelsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Brandon EricksonRothman Orthopaedic Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Peter ChalmersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. p.n.chalmers@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-0285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBaseball has become one of the largest data-driven sports. In this review, we highlight the historical context of how big data and sabermetrics began to transform baseball, the current methods for data collection and analysis in baseball, and a look to the future including emerging technologies. RECENT

findingsMachine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), and modern motion-analysis techniques have shown promise in predicting player performance and preventing injury. With the advent of the Health Injury Tracking System (HITS), numerous studies have been published which highlight the epidemiology and performance implications for specific injuries. Wearable technologies allow for the prospective collection of kinematic data to improve pitching mechanics and prevent injury. Data and analytics research has transcended baseball over time, and the future of this field remains bright.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBaseballMachine learningMotion analysisSabermetrics

Identifiers

PMID35486325
PMCPMC9276858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.