Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486291›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2022

Attitudes and interest in incorporating BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility testing into reproductive carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish men and women.

Melanie W Hardy, Beth N Peshkin, Esther Rose, Mary Kathleen Ladd, Savannah Binion, Mara Tynan, Colleen M McBride, Karen A Grinzaid, Marc D Schwartz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie W HardyDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Beth N PeshkinDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Esther RoseDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mary Kathleen LaddDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Savannah BinionDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Mara TynanDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Colleen M McBrideDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Karen A GrinzaidDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Marc D SchwartzDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA. Schwartm@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2735-5413
Georgetown University · USEmory University · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes are associated with elevated cancer risks in men and women. Due to a founder effect, Ashkenazi Jewish individuals are at higher risk for carrying three specific BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. There have been recent calls for population screening in this population because many carriers do not have family histories suggestive of hereditary cancer. One approach could be to integrate optional BRCA1/2 testing into routinely offered reproductive carrier screening for recessive and X-linked disorders. However, the differing goals of these types of testing (i.e., personal health risks versus family planning) raise questions about the implications for patient education and informed consent. To this end, we aimed to determine interest, attitudes, and preferences regarding integrating such testing by electronically surveying 331 Ashkenazi Jewish participants in JScreen - a national, not-for-profit, at-home carrier screening program focused on genetic risks in Jewish communities. We found that while 41% of participants had plans to pursue BRCA1/2 testing, 93% would have opted for such testing if offered as an add-on to reproductive carrier screening. This was particularly true of those with higher perceived cancer risk and more positive attitudes toward genetic testing. With respect to preferences about delivery of this service, more than 85% of participants preferred remote (telephone, print, or web-based) genetic education rather than traditional genetic counseling. These results suggest that offering optional BRCA1/2 testing within the context of reproductive carrier screening might provide opportunities for cancer prevention without overburdening scarce genetic counseling resources.

Indexed as

Ashkenazi JewishBRCA1BRCA2Carrier screeningHereditary cancerPopulation screeningTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35486291
PMCPMC9051789
OpenAlexW4225121754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.