ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2023
[Dermatomyositis and juvenile dermatomyositis].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- NMJ-associated transcriptomic remodeling correlates with disease severity in juvenile dermatomyositis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Review and Considerations for Older Populations.Drugs & aging · 2024Review
- Cannabinoid Compounds as a Pharmacotherapeutic Option for the Treatment of Non-Cancer Skin Diseases.Cells · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatomyositis (DM) is an inflammatory multisystem disease of unknown etiology, which can already occur in children but first onset can also be in older adulthood. Myalgia and muscle weakness can occur later in the course of the disease or even be completely absent in some forms. Classical signs on the skin include heliotrope rash, facial erythema, Gottron's papules and nailfold capillary abnormalities. For the diagnosis, screening for the presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies has become increasingly more relevant. Muscle enzymes may be elevated but not in approximately one third of patients. In the absence of typical clinical or serologic findings, additional examination methods such as nailfold capillaroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, electromyography, skin or muscle biopsies may help to establish the diagnosis. Depending on the clinical and serological subtype, additional screening for gastrointestinal or cardiopulmonary involvement should be considered. In adults, an age-appropriate tumor screening should also be performed. Apart from corticosteroids as induction therapy, biologics and small molecule inhibitors are gaining in importance in addition to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and intravenous immunoglobulins. The prognosis for DM and juvenile DM (JDM) has improved. Most patients recover at least to some extent; however, a few patients die and a minority develop persisting muscle atrophy or severe calcinosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.