Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486200›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2022

Characterizing plant trait(s) for improved heat tolerance in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) under subtropical climate.

Ashok K Parihar, Kali K Hazra, Amrit Lamichaney, Girish P Dixit, Deepak Singh, Anil K Singh, Narendra P Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-location evaluation of mungbean (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashok K PariharICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
Kali K HazraICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India. kalikrishna123@gmail.com.
Amrit LamichaneyICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India. amritiarisst@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-5863
Girish P DixitICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
Deepak SinghICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Anil K SinghICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
Narendra P SinghICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
Indian Institute of Pulses Research · INIndian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field pea is highly sensitive to climatic vagaries, particularly high-temperature stress. The crop often experiences terminal heat stress in tropical climates indicating the need for the development of heat-tolerant cultivars. Characterization and identification of stress-adaptive plant traits are pre-requisites for breeding stress-tolerant/adaptive cultivar(s). In the study, a panel of 150 diverse field pea genotypes was tested under three different temperature environments (i.e., normal sowing time or non-heat stress environment (NSTE), 15 days after normal sowing time or heat stress environment-I (LSHTE-I), and 30 days after normal sowing time or heat stress environment-II (LSHTE-II)) to verify the effect of high-temperature environment, genotype, and genotype × environment interaction on different plant traits and to elucidate their significance in heat stress adaptation/tolerance. The delayed sowing had exposed field pea crops to high temperatures during flowering stage by + 3.5 °C and + 8.1 °C in the LSHTE-I and LSHTE-II, respectively. Likewise, the maximum ambient temperature during the grain-filling period was + 3.3 °C and + 6.1 °C higher in the LSHTE-I and LSHTE-II over the NSTE. The grain yield loss with heat stress was 25.8 ± 2.2% in LSHTE-I, and 59.3 ± 1.5% in LSHTE-II compared to the NSTE. Exposure of crops to a high-temperature environment during the flowering stage had a higher impact on grain yield than the heat stress at the grain filling period. Results suggested that the reduced sink capacity (pod set (pod plant

Indexed as

Pisum sativumThermotoleranceEdible GrainHeat-Shock ResponsePhenotypeSeedsField peaGGE biplotPhenologySubtropical climateTerminal heat stressTraits association

Identifiers

PMID35486200
OpenAlexW4225114833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.