Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35486153›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Opinion paper: gynecological surgery in local anesthesia?

Felix Neis, Diethelm Wallwiener, Melanie Henes, Bernhard Krämer, Sara Brucker

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felix NeisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. felix.neis@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-561X
Diethelm WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Melanie HenesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernhard KrämerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Sara BruckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpuseThe paracervical block (PCB) is a local anesthesia procedure that can be used to perform gynecological surgeries without the need for further anesthesia. With the PCB, surgeries can be moved from the central operating room to outpatient operating rooms, where they can be performed without the presence of an anesthesia team.

methodsIn this paper, the indications, implementation and limitations of the procedure are discussed.

conclusionEspecially in times of scarce staff and OR resources during the Corona pandemic, OR capacity can be expanded in this way.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalAnesthesia, ObstetricalFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansPandemicsGynecologic surgery without anesthesiaLocal anesthesiaParacervical block

Identifiers

PMID35486153
PMCPMC9470720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.