ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Methodological Approach to Improve Surgical Outcomes of a Pig Subretinal Implantation Model.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal gene therapy using epiretinal AAV-containing fibrin hydrogel implants.Science advances · 2025Article
- Degradable fibrin hydrogels for transplantation of iPSC-derived retinal pigment epithelial cell monolayers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Early Choriocapillaris Loss in a Porcine Model of RPE Cell Debridement Precedes Pathology That Simulates Advanced Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To improve outcomes for subretinal implantation surgery in pigs. Methods: Analysis of variables affecting the success of subretinal implantation surgery was performed on videos of 37 surgeries. Ex vivo experiments were conducted to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) and test various prototyped implanters for effectiveness at maintaining IOP. Results: A video analysis revealed a prolonged sclerotomy open time owing to a combination of uncontrolled bleeding and excessive fluid outflow often resulting in retinal prolapse. Precauterization of the choroid before full-thickness sclerotomy (n = 10) resulted in a reduced incidence of uncontrolled bleeding from 39.1% (9/23) versus 0% (0/10) (P = 0.005) and improved implantation success from 73% to 90%. An ex vivo analysis of the IOP revealed a mean decrease in the IOP from 30.2 ± 3.0 mm Hg to 5.0 ± 2.1 mm Hg after a fully penetrating sclerotomy. To address this situation, we produced a series of plugs that integrated with a custom implant insertion device to seal the sclerotomy during implantation. The use of the plugs was cumbersome, however, and so we opted instead to increase the width of the inserter tip to fill the open sclerotomy. This improved device restored and maintained IOP during implantation (27.1 ± 1.9 mm Hg). Combined with precauterization the improved inserter resulted in 100% successful implantation (n = 4). Conclusions: For subretinal implantation in pigs, a modified procedure to precauterize the choroid before sclerotomy combined with an instrument that better fills the scleral opening decreases bleeding, hypotony, and open sclerotomy time, improving the success rate. Translational Relevance: Better management of IOP and bleeding from a sclerotomy will improve implant-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.