ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022
Timing of cholecystectomy in recurrent attacks of acute cholecystitis.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, its optimal timing is still controversial. In this study, our aim is to determine the appropriate cholecystectomy time by comparing the results of emergency and elective cholecystectomy in patients presenting with recurrent acute cholecystitis.
methodsBetween January 2019 and January 2022, the data of 434 patients who were scheduled for late cholecystectomy and were admitted to our hospital with recurrent cholecystitis attacks during the waiting period were retrospectively evaluated. Demo-graphic data of patients, stage according to Tokyo Guidelines 2018, duration of hospital stay before and after surgery, surgery dura-tion, open surgery rate, drain use, hollow organ injury, biliary tract injury, bleeding, wound infection, post-operative collection, and mortality rates were analyzed.
resultsEmergency LC (group 1) was performed in 176 (40.5%) of 434 patients presenting with recurrent cholecystitis, and elec-tive LC (group 2) was performed in 258 (59.5%) patients. Pre-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in group 2, and mean surgery duration was significantly longer in group 1 (p=0.001 and p=0.035, respectively). Gastric or intestinal injury, biliary tract injury, wound infection, and mortality were not detected in either group. There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of open surgery and postoperative collection rates (p>0.05).
conclusionIn centers experienced in hepatobiliary surgery, LC can be safely performed in recurrent acute cholecystitis attacks, regardless of symptom duration and the number of attacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.