Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35485512›Full record

Trial reportUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022

The effect of anesthetic agents on intraocular pressure during laparoscopic gynecological surgery performed in the Trendelenburg position: A randomized clinical trial.

Bedih Balkan, Furkan Tontu, Döndü Genç Moralar, Bengi Demirayak, Nalan Saygı Emir, Abdulkadir Yektaş

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bedih BalkanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Science University, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.
Furkan TontuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Science University, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.
Döndü Genç MoralarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Science University, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.
Bengi DemirayakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Health Science University, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.
Nalan Saygı EmirDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Science University, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.
Abdulkadir YektaşDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Science University, Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır-Turkey.
Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraocular pressure (IOP) increases due to pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position during laparo-scopic surgery. Apart from ketamine and suxamethonium, anesthetic agents generally reduce IOP by various extents. The present study investigated the effects of combinations of four anesthetic agents on IOP during laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

methodsPatients (n=100) were assigned to one of the four groups: Group 1 (n=25; pentothal induction + desflurane/remifen-tanil maintenance), Group 2 (n=25; propofol induction + sevoflurane/remifentanil maintenance), Group 3 (n=25; propofol induction + desflurane/remifentanil maintenance), and Group 4 (n=25; pentothal induction + sevoflurane/remifentanil maintenance). The IOPs recorded before anesthesia induction, after intubation, after carbon dioxide insufflation, in the Trendelenburg position, and after ex-tubation were compared among the groups. Hemodynamic parameters were also evaluated.

resultsInduction in Group 2 and Group 3 used propofol. When the IOP in the Trendelenburg position was compared with the IOP before induction, there was no statistically significant difference in Groups 2 and 3 (p>0.05). In Groups 1 and 4, pentothal was used for induction. The IOP in Groups 1 and 4 was statistically significantly higher in the Trendelenburg position than it was before induction (0.027-0.001).

conclusionTo minimize the variation in IOP in the Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic gynecological surgeries, we recommend the use of propofol for induction, independent of desflurane or sevoflurane use.

Indexed as

AnestheticsLaparoscopyPropofolDesfluraneFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHead-Down TiltHumansIntraocular PressureRemifentanilSevofluraneThiopentalAnestheticsDesfluranePropofolRemifentanilSevofluraneThiopental

Identifiers

PMID35485512
PMCPMC10443124
OpenAlexW3118069001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.