Observational studyUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022
Use of a modified surgical APGAR score for prediction of postoperative complications in emergency surgery: An observational retrospective study.
Observational study in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe surgical Apgar score (SAS) was defined by Gawande et al. in 2007. It has been shown that this scoring system was highly effective for predicting the incidence of post-operative complications and mortality. In this study, we aimed to define a new, modified SAS (mSAS) for predicting the incidence of post-operative complications and mortality in emergency surgery. We also wanted to quantify the effectiveness of this modified scoring system, comprising of the duration of the operation in addition to the three intraoperative parameters of the SAS score.
methodsFive hundred and seventy-nine patients who underwent emergency surgery were enrolled in this retrospective obser-vational study. At the end of the operation, the SAS was calculated from the data obtained from the examination of the patients and the mSAS was calculated by adding the duration of the operation to data used in the calculation of the SAS (Surgical duration >8 h; -4 points; 7.01-8 h; -3 points; 5.01-7 h; -2 points; 3.01-5 h; -1 points; 0-3 h; 0 points added).
resultsThere was a statistically significant relationship between the mSAS and the total number of complications (as operative time [OT] increased, the number of complications increased) (r=0.360; p=0.001). The compliance levels of the SAS and mSAS were 98.4% and they have been found as statistically significant (ICC: 0.984; p=0.001; p<0.01).
conclusionWe suggest that the OT should be included as a simple, objective and practical indication of the SAS risk score in major operations. The mSAS was an independent predictor of post-operative mortality and complications. With the widespread use of electronic medical record systems and the effective use of pre-operative medical data, the mSAS can be used as an easy and new scoring system to predict prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.